On 01/14/2011 01:39 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
13 jan 2011 kl. 23.36 skrev Paul Kyzivat:
On 1/13/2011 10:38 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2011/1/13 Olle E. Johanssono...@edvina.net:
- Does your UA add an SDP to a 488 error message?
Most probably no UA in the world adds SDP to a 488
Also, the following from the description of 488:
A message body containing a description of media capabilities MAY be
present in the response, which is formatted according to the Accept
header field in the INVITE (or application/sdp if not present), the
same as a message body in a
13 jan 2011 kl. 15.36 skrev Paul Kyzivat:
Also, the following from the description of 488:
A message body containing a description of media capabilities MAY be
present in the response, which is formatted according to the Accept
header field in the INVITE (or application/sdp if not
On 01/13/2011 08:57 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
13 jan 2011 kl. 15.36 skrev Paul Kyzivat:
Also, the following from the description of 488:
A message body containing a description of media capabilities MAY be
present in the response, which is formatted according to the Accept
2011/1/13 Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net:
- Does your UA add an SDP to a 488 error message?
Most probably no UA in the world adds SDP to a 488 response.
And for sure, no UA in the galaxy would inspect/interpret a SDP in a
488 response, at least not within next 20 years.
--
Iñaki Baz
On 1/13/2011 10:38 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2011/1/13 Olle E. Johanssono...@edvina.net:
- Does your UA add an SDP to a 488 error message?
Most probably no UA in the world adds SDP to a 488 response.
I don't know, but I suspect you are right, or nearly so.
And for sure, no UA in the
13 jan 2011 kl. 23.36 skrev Paul Kyzivat:
On 1/13/2011 10:38 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2011/1/13 Olle E. Johanssono...@edvina.net:
- Does your UA add an SDP to a 488 error message?
Most probably no UA in the world adds SDP to a 488 response.
I don't know, but I suspect you are
10 jan 2011 kl. 22.19 skrev Saúl Ibarra Corretgé:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote:
10 jan 2011 kl. 14.07 skrev Kevin P. Fleming:
On 01/10/2011 03:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
The draft changes the SDP offer/answer model so that an answer has to
I thought of that - but what would we put there that everyone could support?
For the codec related 488, a 305 Incompatible media format could be
used. For IPv4/IPv6 stuff, 300 Incompatible network protocol or 301
Incompatible network address formats could help.
If none of them suit the needs,
11 jan 2011 kl. 11.20 skrev Saúl Ibarra Corretgé:
I thought of that - but what would we put there that everyone could support?
For the codec related 488, a 305 Incompatible media format could be
used. For IPv4/IPv6 stuff, 300 Incompatible network protocol or 301
Incompatible network
The draft changes the SDP offer/answer model so that an answer has to use the
same protocol family (ipv4/ipv6) as the offer, which makes sense.
Two things remain unclear to me:
- If I get an offer for media based on an address family I can not understand -
what's the valid response?
If
On 01/10/2011 03:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
The draft changes the SDP offer/answer model so that an answer has to use the
same protocol family (ipv4/ipv6) as the offer, which makes sense.
Two things remain unclear to me:
- If I get an offer for media based on an address family I can
10 jan 2011 kl. 14.07 skrev Kevin P. Fleming:
On 01/10/2011 03:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
The draft changes the SDP offer/answer model so that an answer has to use
the same protocol family (ipv4/ipv6) as the offer, which makes sense.
Two things remain unclear to me:
- If I get
On 01/10/2011 11:08 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
10 jan 2011 kl. 14.07 skrev Kevin P. Fleming:
On 01/10/2011 03:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
The draft changes the SDP offer/answer model so that an answer has to use
the same protocol family (ipv4/ipv6) as the offer, which makes sense.
10 jan 2011 kl. 18.28 skrev Kevin P. Fleming:
On 01/10/2011 11:08 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
10 jan 2011 kl. 14.07 skrev Kevin P. Fleming:
On 01/10/2011 03:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
The draft changes the SDP offer/answer model so that an answer has to use
the same protocol
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net wrote:
10 jan 2011 kl. 14.07 skrev Kevin P. Fleming:
On 01/10/2011 03:59 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
The draft changes the SDP offer/answer model so that an answer has to use
the same protocol family (ipv4/ipv6) as the
16 matches
Mail list logo
