rather than terminating the dialog.
cheers,
(-:bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 6:45 PM
To: Brett Tate
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] rfc3261 and rfc5057
Brett Tate wrote:
> If OPTIONS 481 really MUST be sent and SHOULD trigger subsequent
> requests/responses to terminate the dialog, I'm sure some would like to
> use it within early dialogs, subscriptions, and elsewhere.
Whether 481 SHOULD/MUST be returned to the OPTIONS is one question.
Whether
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the response.
Within the archives, I found http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=400
which discusses OPTIONS within dialog.
Unfortunately I haven't found much concerning the topic within the old
email archives. Thus I'm not positive if all the objections to
returning 481 w
