n of the tel URL syntax.
Thanks,
Paul
> Andrea
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@cisco.com]
> Sent: mercoledì 21 gennaio 2009 17.29
> To: Andrea Rizzi
> Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implem
ubject: Re: [Sip-implementors] user=phone usage in SIP trunking gateways
Andrea Rizzi wrote:
> On the other hand, RFC3966, Section 12 says:
>
> "When the '+' sign is not present, but a telephone number is
>
> represented by the user portion of the URI, the SIP URI
I'm coming back to an old question as it appears to me RFCs says
differently about.
Quoting an old answers from Paul:
"If user=phone is present, then the syntax of the user part must conform
with the TEL URI syntax as defined in RFC 3966.
That syntax says that the number must start wi
Andrea Rizzi wrote:
> On the other hand, RFC3966, Section 12 says:
>
> "When the '+' sign is not present, but a telephone number is
>
> represented by the user portion of the URI, the SIP URI SHOULD
>
> contain the optional ';user=phone' parameter; e.g.,
>
> To: sip:83...@sip.example.net;use
I'm coming back to an old question as it appears to me RFCs says differently
about.
Quoting an old answers from Paul:
"If user=phone is present, then the syntax of the user part must conform
with the TEL URI syntax as defined in RFC 3966.
That syntax says that the number must start wi
