Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission

2018-01-03 Thread Dale R. Worley
onewhoknows writes: > I have an issue with some older releases of Asterisk talking to an Avaya > PBX. > > I think there's a network issue somewhere, but in the meantime, I'd like to > know which side is handling the following transaction correctly: > > Asterisk > Avaya > Invite > > < 100 Trying >

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission

2018-01-03 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 1/3/18 7:54 PM, onewhoknows wrote: Hello, I have an issue with some older releases of Asterisk talking to an Avaya PBX. I think there's a network issue somewhere, but in the meantime, I'd like to know which side is handling the following transaction correctly: Asterisk > Avaya Invite > < 10

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission

2014-04-29 Thread ankur bansal
akumar...@yahoo.com] > *Sent:* Monday, April 28, 2014 9:59 PM > *To:* Brett Tate; Sip-implementors > *Subject:* Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission > > > > Thanks Brett. > > > > so for 200 OK retranmission we start at t1 and stop at T2 and continue > unti

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission

2014-04-29 Thread Brett Tate
See RFC 3262 section 3. *From:* Aditya Kumar [mailto:adityakumar...@yahoo.com] *Sent:* Monday, April 28, 2014 9:59 PM *To:* Brett Tate; Sip-implementors *Subject:* Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission Thanks Brett. so for 200 OK retranmission we start at t1 and stop at T2 and

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission

2014-04-28 Thread Aditya Kumar
Thanks Brett. so for 200 OK retranmission we start at t1 and stop at T2 and continue untill we receive 64t1. can you also pl conform how the 18x need to beĀ transmitted (both TCP and UDP with 100rel)? this should be t1, 2t1,4t1?. ___ Sip-implementor

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission

2014-04-22 Thread Brett Tate
> how about PRACK-response on TCP? The PRACK and PRACK response retransmissions behave like other non-INVITE requests/responses. > if UA sends PRACK on TCP does not receive > 200 OK for prack? should it retransmit? No. -- This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission

2014-04-21 Thread Aditya Kumar
Thanks Brett for the detail explanation. So retransmission is needed in any transport layer. Related question, how about PRACK-response on TCP? if UA sends PRACK on TCP does not receive 200 OK for prack? should it retransmit? if so what is the Timer On Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:39 PM, Brett Tat

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 Ok retransmission

2014-04-17 Thread Brett Tate
Hi, It doesn't sound like you are interpreting section 13.3.1.4 correctly. Using default values, retransmissions occur .5, 1, 2, 4, 4, 4, ... until the 64*T1 timer pops. Also notice that 2xx is retransmitted over TCP. "Once the response has been constructed, it is passed to the INVITE server t

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission

2008-05-08 Thread JEEVANANDHAM KARTHIC KUMAR
endra Singh Bhadoriya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:10 PM To: JEEVANANDHAM KARTHIC KUMAR Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission Hi Karthic, I have a doubt here. The retransmission of the 2xx response In case A

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission

2008-05-08 Thread sanjay.dhand
riya Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:10 PM To: JEEVANANDHAM KARTHIC KUMAR Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission Hi Karthic, I have a doubt here. The retransmission of the 2xx response In case ACK is not received will happen as below 1st 2xx

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission

2008-05-08 Thread Jitendra Singh Bhadoriya
@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission Hello Jitendra, I think we can confirm from following section in RFC 3261 13.3.1.4 The INVITE is Accepted The 2xx response is passed to the transport with an interval that starts at T1 seconds and doubles for each

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission

2008-05-07 Thread JEEVANANDHAM KARTHIC KUMAR
sday, May 07, 2008 3:05 PM To: Jitendra Singh Bhadoriya; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission Hi, UAS should retransmit 200 OK at the interval of Timer G(initially T1 then 2*T1) up to the timer H (64*T1). Ref RFC 3261: A Table of Timer Valu

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission

2008-05-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > JEEVANANDHAM KARTHIC KUMAR > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 3:05 PM > To: Jitendra Singh Bhadoriya; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission > > Hi, > > U

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission

2008-05-07 Thread Jitendra Singh Bhadoriya
07, 2008 3:05 PM To: Jitendra Singh Bhadoriya; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission Hi, UAS should retransmit 200 OK at the interval of Timer G(initially T1 then 2*T1) up to the timer H (64*T1). Ref RFC 3261: A Table of Timer Values Timer

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission

2008-05-07 Thread Vikram Chhibber
Also see: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sparks-sip-invfix-01.txt On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:04 PM, JEEVANANDHAM KARTHIC KUMAR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > UAS should retransmit 200 OK at the interval of Timer G(initially T1 > then 2*T1) up to the timer H (64*T1). > Ref RFC 32

Re: [Sip-implementors] 200 OK Retransmission

2008-05-07 Thread JEEVANANDHAM KARTHIC KUMAR
Hi, UAS should retransmit 200 OK at the interval of Timer G(initially T1 then 2*T1) up to the timer H (64*T1). Ref RFC 3261: A Table of Timer Values Timer G - INVITE response retransmit interval Timer H - Wait time for ACK receipt Regards, Karthic -Original Message- From: [EMAI