Re: [sipx-dev] Openacd - 3rd Party Transfer

Hi George, Sure, I will post this in the openacd mailing list. Regards, Chitra George Niculae wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Chitra wrote: Hi All, With respect to the below email regarding 3rd party transfer option in agent UI: I tried the following scenario: Scenar

Re: [sipx-dev] Openacd - 3rd Party Transfer

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Chitra wrote: > Hi All, > > With respect to the below email regarding 3rd party transfer option in agent > UI: > > I tried the following scenario: > > Scenario: > Openacd call center Line : 700 > Agent is 201 > > a.Call openacd extension 700 > b.201 agent phone rin

[sipx-dev] centos 5.5 deprecated

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Levend Sayar wrote: > We have a continuous integration machine that builds > everyday. Instead of downloading same packages from centos > each day, we copy 5.5 rpms on a local web server and build > uses that server. In fact, this is one of the alternatives > that build sy

Re: [sipx-dev] centos 5.5 deprecated

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Levend Sayar wrote: > We have a continuous integration machine that builds everyday. Instead of > downloading same packages from centos each day, we copy 5.5 rpms on a local > web server and build uses that server. In fact, this is one of the > alternatives that

Re: [sipx-dev] centos 5.5 deprecated

We have a continuous integration machine that builds everyday. Instead of downloading same packages from centos each day, we copy 5.5 rpms on a local web server and build uses that server. In fact, this is one of the alternatives that build system supplies. By doing this, I did not notice that

[sipx-dev] centos 5.5 deprecated

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Douglas Hubler wrote: > You may be going down this path which i point out the issues with > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.sipfoundry.general/34371 > > Now if you want to maintain a mirror of CentOS and is updated to > upstream on a automatic basis, so you

Re: [sipx-dev] Configuration of SRTP

Hi Joegen, Thanks for the update...I created a issue XX-9675 and assigned to you(Regarding SRTP).Please check it.. Regards, Kumaran T Joegen Baclor wrote: > No there is no such option that would disable user authentication. > > On 06/13/2011 07:

Re: [sipx-dev] Configuration of SRTP

No there is no such option that would disable user authentication. On 06/13/2011 07:42 PM, Kumaran wrote: > Hi Joegen, > Thanks for update Joegen.I will do it and assign to you after creating > the issue...One more query is "is there any option to enable or > disable user authentication on the s

Re: [sipx-dev] Configuration of SRTP

Hi Joegen, Thanks for update Joegen.I will do it and assign to you after creating the issue...One more query is "is there any option to enable or disable user authentication on the server(not related SRTP)".Please let me know the update... Regards, Kumaran T Joegen Baclor wrote: > I guess th

Re: [sipx-dev] Configuration of SRTP

I guess the best way is to report the jira against a 4.4 test since that config seems to be an old one, it should affect 4.4 as well. On 06/13/2011 07:24 PM, Kumaran wrote: > Hi Joegen, >Sure I will raise it but I cannot touch snapshot because we had > a problem.Whether I can attach a pc

Re: [sipx-dev] Configuration of SRTP

Hi Joegen, Sure I will raise it but I cannot touch snapshot because we had a problem.Whether I can attach a pcap or make a call to AA and attach a freeswitch.log? Regards, Kumaran T Joegen Baclor wrote: > Hi Kumaran, > > I've checked the config and indeed that seems to be the only thin

Re: [sipx-dev] Openacd - 3rd Party Transfer

Hi All, With respect to the below email regarding 3rd party transfer option in agent UI: I tried the following scenario: Scenario: Openacd call center Line : 700 Agent is 201 a.Call openacd extension 700 b.201 agent phone rings and the call is established between these two phones c.Now from

Re: [sipx-dev] Configuration of SRTP

Hi Kumaran, I've checked the config and indeed that seems to be the only thing you need to set to enable SRTP offers. I guess a jira is a good idea so the config team can take a look under the hood. On 06/13/2011 03:35 PM, Kumaran wrote: > Hi Joegen, >Any update about the SRTP(whether I ne

Re: [sipx-dev] Missing Via Header in OPTIONS messages

Tony, This is NAT keep-alive for UDP. For TCP, there is no need for options since the REGISTER usage would normally stay connected and get recycled for INVITE. On 06/13/2011 03:09 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: what if the phone is already using tcp for signaling, media and keepalive? On Jun 13

Re: [sipx-dev] Missing Via Header in OPTIONS messages

Hi Kemal, This is a known issue and I think the patch is good. On 06/13/2011 03:04 PM, Kemal Eroğlu wrote: Hello, Previous week, we had a problem while testing the NAT. SipXecs sends OPTIONS messages once every 20 seconds to provide NAT keepalive. But these OPTIONS messages have empty Via fi

Re: [sipx-dev] centos 5.5 deprecated

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Levend Sayar wrote: > Hi, all. > > There is a commit due to deprecation of centos 5.5. All url related to > centos moved from 5.5 to 5 in the build scripts. > We are using a local web server instead of downloading each time from > centos during the build. > For thi

Re: [sipx-dev] Configuration of SRTP

Hi Joegen, Any update about the SRTP(whether I need to do something else in setting or Enable the SRTP under phones->security is enough) or need to rise a Jira? Regards, Venkateshwaran T Kumaran wrote: > Hi Joegen, > Whether this is a issue or configuration problem.Some points are >

[sipx-dev] Openacd - 3rd Party Transfer

Hi All, This is regarding 3rd party transfer option available in Supervisor UI. Could anyone let us know what is the exact use of 3rd party transfer in Openacd call center. Thanks & Regards, Chitra ___ sipx-dev mailing list sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.or

Re: [sipx-dev] Missing Via Header in OPTIONS messages

I checked the code but could not find a place, where the transport type for OPTIONS messages is different than UDP. This is why I did like this. On 13 June 2011 10:09, Tony Graziano wrote: > what if the phone is already using tcp for signaling, media and keepalive? > On Jun 13, 2011 3:04 AM, "K

Re: [sipx-dev] Missing Via Header in OPTIONS messages

what if the phone is already using tcp for signaling, media and keepalive? On Jun 13, 2011 3:04 AM, "Kemal Eroğlu" wrote: > Hello, > > Previous week, we had a problem while testing the NAT. SipXecs sends OPTIONS > messages once every 20 seconds to provide NAT keepalive. But these OPTIONS > message

[sipx-dev] Missing Via Header in OPTIONS messages

Hello, Previous week, we had a problem while testing the NAT. SipXecs sends OPTIONS messages once every 20 seconds to provide NAT keepalive. But these OPTIONS messages have empty Via fields. While some softphones like Bria, Eyebeam can handle such a condition by sending back "Missing Mandatory fie