On Wed, 2 May 2012, Dan Chang wrote:
> I know there have been RPM build fixes being committed to the main
> branch (and I appreciate them!) but I seem to still be seeing errors
> with RPM builds. It looks like some kind of library path problem with
> files from the new sqa (StateQueueNotification
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> [this email came in after I had restarted a scripted build]
sadly, after 92 minutes:
ERROR:
Exception(repo/CentOS_6/source/sipxcalllib-0.0.4.5.2-1371.g0a675.src.rpm)
Config(centos-6-x86_64) 0 minu
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:39 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
>>
>> Under the instructions at:
>>
>> http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Building+RPMS+on+CentOS+or+Fedora
>> I continue to obtain the failure note
Under the instructions at:
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Building+RPMS+on+CentOS+or+Fedora
I continue to obtain the failure noted over the weekend
Centos 6, environment, with EPElk enabled, x86_86 arch
...
INFO: State Changed: build
INFO: ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c'
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, George Niculae wrote:
>> You should get more details from build.log, anything there?
build environment:
Centos 6, 64 bit updated to current
[herrold@sipxecs-builder ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.2 (Final)
[herrold@sipxecs-builder ~]$ cd sipxecs/sipxecs/build
[
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Douglas Hubler wrote:
earlier:
>> [on CentoS 5] I'm on step 7 of
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Building+RPMS+on+CentOS+or+Fedora
I would add:
at a minimum, a
cd ..
is missing between step 4 and step 7.
On centos 6, updated to current:
[herrold@sip
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011, Domenico Chierico wrote:
> I'm trying to build rpms for 4.5 but I'm quite new to mock system.
>
> I need to add support for ruby in freeswitch, so I've modified the spec
> file and run the build script. everithing seems all right even if the
> fact that ruby.h seems to be miss
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Levend Sayar wrote:
> We have a continuous integration machine that builds
> everyday. Instead of downloading same packages from centos
> each day, we copy 5.5 rpms on a local web server and build
> uses that server. In fact, this is one of the alternatives
> that build sy
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> You may be going down this path which i point out the issues with
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.sipfoundry.general/34371
>
> Now if you want to maintain a mirror of CentOS and is updated to
> upstream on a automatic basis, so you
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:53 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
>> Usually a local 'lookaside cache' is added as a first step
>> when buildsystem speed gets important.
>
> as the first step, mock v0.6 that comes w/centos didn't
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> * Use mock utility now instead of installing rpms after building.
> Cannot say how amazing this tool is (thank you Russ H.!), almost as
> amazing as it is slow the first time you warm the yum cache. mock is
> also invaluable to testing rpm specs and depe
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, David Becker wrote:
> After running
> autoreconf -if
> ./configure --prefix=/root/INSTALL
I see later back on forth on this piece, but to address the
matter, as to the autoconf/configure issue,
Conventionally, --prefix is set to: /usr or /usr/local
As I recall there was a
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Martin Steinmann wrote:
> We finally went live with our new SIPfoundry Web site.
> Many thanks to everyone who contributed to this joint
> effort. Let us know what you think about it.
The 'click-thru' terms of service contian this:
The copying, redistribution, use
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Martin Steinmann wrote:
> We finally went live with our new SIPfoundry Web site. Many thanks to
> everyone who contributed to this joint effort. Let us know what you think
> about it.
I get the following confirmation / random password hash,
when setting up an account at:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Martin Steinmann wrote:
> We finally went live with our new SIPfoundry Web site.
> Many thanks to everyone who contributed to this joint
> effort. Let us know what you think about it.
late to the conversation, but I am sort of 'assuming' that you
mean:
this site?
15 matches
Mail list logo
