Re: [sipx-dev] firewall page - show only ports related to enabled features

Agreed... I just think it's 'non-managed' for now. I don't see any reason why simple needs should be difficult to manage. On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Tony Graziano < tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > OK, I was given the impression that it should be moved to "non-managed", > though I

Re: [sipx-dev] firewall page - show only ports related to enabled features

OK, I was given the impression that it should be moved to "non-managed", though I don't think adding a few custom rules warrants the headache if it can be rolled in. Thanks for the JIRA. I voted for it. On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Michael Picher wrote: > Anything to simplify. > > Tony, I d

Re: [sipx-dev] firewall page - show only ports related to enabled features

Anything to simplify. Tony, I didn't see a feature request and I had asked for too, so I created one: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-10403 Thanks, Mike On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > +1. > > Though I'd still like to be able to define a few custom ports via > s

Re: [sipx-dev] firewall page - show only ports related to enabled features

+1. Though I'd still like to be able to define a few custom ports via sipxconfig. On Aug 26, 2012 5:04 PM, "George Niculae" wrote: > I'd like to propose an improvement to System > Firewall page - that is > to show only ports for enabled features (this way list will be shorter > and will present

[sipx-dev] firewall page - show only ports related to enabled features

I'd like to propose an improvement to System > Firewall page - that is to show only ports for enabled features (this way list will be shorter and will present only things that can really be configured / end up in iptables rules). Basically the classes implementing FirewallProvider to check if featu

[sipx-dev] Firewall Testing

Hi All, Wanted to share the approach we are using to test Firewall and seek your inputs if any thing else needs to be included for the current round of testing. - Test based on the default server groups (Cluster/ Public). Not creating any thing new right now. - Change the default server grou

Re: [sipx-dev] Firewall

Same thing Douglas...Thanks..I hope in next update the text will be updated... Regards, Kumaran T On 8/3/2012 4:55 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > we need to add resource strings for those, if that's what you're > asking. I just added > > [dhubler@swift sipxecs]$ git show 4c7a1061e146f2f67844ce5ad4

Re: [sipx-dev] Firewall

we need to add resource strings for those, if that's what you're asking. I just added [dhubler@swift sipxecs]$ git show 4c7a1061e146f2f67844ce5ad4dfb9502078e436 commit 4c7a1061e146f2f67844ce5ad4dfb9502078e436 Author: Douglas Hubler Date: Fri Aug 3 07:25:06 2012 -0400 Add textual descripti

Re: [sipx-dev] Firewall

Douglas, Following services names are valid or should be updated in firewall settings address.mysql address.redis Regards, Kumaran T ___ sipx-dev mailing list sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-de

Re: [sipx-dev] Firewall

On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Michael Picher wrote: > Would it also be worthwhile adding a little more detail as to what ports are > being specified by the rules? This would be a handy reference for > administrators. Yep. agreed. We can add this to feature request. Technically we don't know

Re: [sipx-dev] Firewall

Would it also be worthwhile adding a little more detail as to what ports are being specified by the rules? This would be a handy reference for administrators. Thanks, Mike On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Kumaran < thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com> wrote: > OK DouglasIn firewall optio

Re: [sipx-dev] Firewall

OK DouglasIn firewall option I noticed following option as "address.mysql"...This is correct service or feature? Regards, Kumaran T On 8/3/2012 2:30 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > very good suggestion, please open a jira. It maybe 4.6.1, but > definitely worth doing sooner rather than later.

Re: [sipx-dev] Firewall

very good suggestion, please open a jira. It maybe 4.6.1, but definitely worth doing sooner rather than later. On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Kumaran wrote: > Hi All, > How about adding default button or reset button in firewall tab to > make all setting to default value(Default value pres

[sipx-dev] Firewall

Hi All, How about adding default button or reset button in firewall tab to make all setting to default value(Default value present after fresh installation) instead going to each option and changing it? Regards, Kumaran T ___ sipx-dev mailing list

Re: [sipx-dev] firewall blocking openfire console

On 7/31/2012 6:31 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Kumaran > wrote: >> On 7/31/2012 5:54 PM, Mircea Carasel wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Mircea Carasel wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Kumaran >>> wrote: Hi All, If

Re: [sipx-dev] firewall blocking openfire console

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Kumaran wrote: > On 7/31/2012 5:54 PM, Mircea Carasel wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Mircea Carasel wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Kumaran >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>>If I enable firewall I can login to user IM client(issue

Re: [sipx-dev] firewall blocking openfire console

On 7/31/2012 5:54 PM, Mircea Carasel wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Mircea Carasel > wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Kumaran mailto:thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com>> wrote: Hi All, If I enable firewall I can login t

Re: [sipx-dev] firewall blocking openfire console

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Mircea Carasel wrote: > Not quite, we have a firewall rule for port 9094 - this is the XML-RPC port > as well, please go to Firewall page and mark XMPP xml RPC public, and you > will have port 9094 opened I love it when a plan comes together ;) ___

Re: [sipx-dev] firewall blocking openfire console

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Mircea Carasel wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Kumaran < > thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >>If I enable firewall I can login to user IM client(issue fixed >> XX-10335) but openfire console is not opening(The connection h

Re: [sipx-dev] firewall blocking openfire console

On 7/31/2012 5:50 PM, Mircea Carasel wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Kumaran > wrote: Hi All, If I enable firewall I can login to user IM client(issue fixed XX-10335) but openfire console is not opening(The connection has ti

Re: [sipx-dev] firewall blocking openfire console

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Kumaran < thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com> wrote: > Hi All, >If I enable firewall I can login to user IM client(issue fixed > XX-10335) but openfire console is not opening(The connection has timed > out) > Openfire console runs on port 9094 (non secur

[sipx-dev] firewall blocking openfire console

Hi All, If I enable firewall I can login to user IM client(issue fixed XX-10335) but openfire console is not opening(The connection has timed out) Regards, Kumaran T ___ sipx-dev mailing list sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://li

[sipX-dev] Firewall/Configuration questions for siptrunking/remote worker

4.1.0-015463 2009-05-09T14:04:23 ecs-centos5 I have siptrunking and remote NAT traversal configured, and am trying to test features and make sure my configuration is set properly. I do not have any remote workers setup or configured yet, as I am trying to work through this in more than one step