I'll take a look at the those linksys phones. If you ever get a chance to test
paging and intercom functions please report your progress.
-Matt
>>> Carlos Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/14/08 7:12 PM >>>
On Jul 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Matt White wrote:
> We typically use polycom phones for our
On Jul 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Matt White wrote:
> We typically use polycom phones for our sip deployments. But every
> now and then we come across a customer that just doesn't like the
> polycom phones.
>
> Can anybody suggest a line of phones that is as well supported as
> polycom??
As w
>
>paging and intercom work on the ciscos as far as i know (i tried them
on
>a 7960 a while back), but paging requires adding a separate extension
>that is set to autoanswer, then making that part of the paging group
>instead of the main extension. kind of a pain, but it works.
>
>it's kind of fun
paging and intercom work on the ciscos as far as i know (i tried them on
a 7960 a while back), but paging requires adding a separate extension
that is set to autoanswer, then making that part of the paging group
instead of the main extension. kind of a pain, but it works.
it's kind of funny that
We typically use polycom phones for our sip deployments. But every now and
then we come across a customer that just doesn't like the polycom phones.
Can anybody suggest a line of phones that is as well supported as polycom??
Specifically, things like paging, intercom and presence support are a
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 21:18 +0530, VG wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> While compiling sipx3.11.1 sipxtacklib if got following errors,
Questions about compiling belong on the dev list, please.
3.11.1 was months ago on mainline... no one should be using it now.
--
Scott Lawrence tel:+1.781.229.0533;ext=162
Hi ,
While compiling sipx3.11.1 sipxtacklib if got following errors,
Please help me out.
/src/.libs/libsipXtack.so: undefined reference to `Url::operator=(char
const*)'
../../src/.libs/libsipXtack.so: undefined reference to
`SipRefreshManager::stopRefresh(char const*)'
../../src/.libs/libsipXtac
>>> "Robert Joly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/14/08 09:20AM >>>
Michael and Tony, thank you for all your prompt comments on this - thank
you for sharing your Patton expertise.
> I think Robert is curious whether one can have a gateway (he
> stated FXO or PRI) "register" to sipx. So "yes" I think i
Are there any known issues still holding up 3.10.2 from being released. Can
someone provide some guidance on the timetable for this?
Thanks,
Tony
>>> "Tony Graziano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/08/08 06:10PM >>>
I see no movement on http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XECS-1457 and it is
slated for 4
>>> "Robert Joly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/14/08 09:20AM >>>
Michael and Tony, thank you for all your prompt comments on this - thank
you for sharing your Patton expertise.
> I think Robert is curious whether one can have a gateway (he
> stated FXO or PRI) "register" to sipx. So "yes" I think
Michael and Tony, thank you for all your prompt comments on this - thank
you for sharing your Patton expertise.
> I think Robert is curious whether one can have a gateway (he
> stated FXO or PRI) "register" to sipx. So "yes" I think it
> can be done. It might have something to do with testing a
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 10:47 +0530, VG wrote:
> Hello Friends,
>
> I am confused with these two terms :
> Softswitch.
> IPPBX.
>
> I have read about both.
> I relate sipx with softswitch. but as mentioned on the sipx site its
> an IPPBX.
> Which feature lakes it to be a Softswitch.
> Please expla
I use those two terms interchangeably.
What are the definitions you are looking at? What functionality are you
concerned that one might have vs. the other.
Mike
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of VG
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 1:18 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sip
13 matches
Mail list logo
