Paul Mossman wrote:
Damian wrote:
Scott Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 10:11 -0500, Paul Mossman wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone think of a good reason to keep the Polycom "SIP
Settings
in DHCP" screen around?
It is cumbersome to use with sipXecs, and I don't
Becker, Jesse wrote:
> Thanks, Damian. I will switch over to Fedora. Fedora is up to version
> 10. Which versions are compatible with sipxecs?
>
Fedora 8 if you need nightly build now.
We would probably switch to Fedora 10 pretty soon. Couple of developers are
running it but there is no active bu
Thanks, Damian. I will switch over to Fedora. Fedora is up to version
10. Which versions are compatible with sipxecs?
Jes
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Damian
Krzeminski
Sent: Tuesday, January 2
Hi Chris,
A blank mappingRules.externalRulesFileName shouldn't cause a problem.
Can you set the RLS and Proxy log levels to debug, make some calls that
you don't get BLF for, take a Snapshot, and open a JIRA issue?
Thanks.
-Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.si
Becker, Jesse wrote:
> Damian,
> Sorry if I have been using the wrong list. I am still getting
> the same error. Do you think that my CentOS system is caching the
> dependency list. When I do a yum remove sipxecs it states that there is
> nothing to remove. When I do a yum install sipxecs it
Damian,
Sorry if I have been using the wrong list. I am still getting
the same error. Do you think that my CentOS system is caching the
dependency list. When I do a yum remove sipxecs it states that there is
nothing to remove. When I do a yum install sipxecs it still fails with
the message
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 14:57 -0500, Gilmour, Scott wrote:
> Ok Thanks but I have to disagree. Since everything is fine until I
> see this message.
The message may be related to your problem, but then, it may be
coincidental. It seems to happen on other people's systems, and nothing
bad happens to
Ok Thanks but I have to disagree. Since everything is fine until I see this
message.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 2:48 PM
To: Gilmour, Scott
Cc: Dale Worley; sipX-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] INIT: version 2
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 14:28 -0500, Gilmour, Scott wrote:
> Dale,
> I read this post and it doesn't really say how to fix it. The problem
> I have is that my phones keep on registering then I have to reboot to
> recover the phones.
> If I didn't have to reboot it wouldn't be a big deal. But since
Dale,
I read this post and it doesn't really say how to fix it. The problem I have
is that my phones keep on registering then I have to reboot to recover the
phones.
If I didn't have to reboot it wouldn't be a big deal. But since I do have to
reboot this is an issue for me.
Thanks
Scott
-
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 23:41 -0800, rgxv zxv wrote:
> I am a newbie and trying to make calls with SIPX. I installed and
> configured sipx. I am using an external DNS server and just have A
> entries for my domain. That's why i am using Fully Qualified host name
> (pingtel.europe.nortel.com).
The u
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:53 -0500, Gilmour, Scott wrote:
> I keep on seeing my phones go to registering. Then when I go to my
> server I see this message:
>
> INIT: version 2.86 reloading
It seems to be harmless:
http://osdir.com/ml/redhat.rhl.general/2003-11/msg02278.html
Dale
Becker, Jesse wrote:
> I left the group off on this reply. The packages still win not install.
> I installed the replacement package: sipx-freeswitch.i386 manually and
> then tried yum install sipxecs and this package is still looking for
> sipxconfig-conference.
> I tried installing yum-skip-broke
Hi all,
Is there a way somebody can help me get a SIP firmware for tadiran T208M phones
so that I can register it with SIPX? I have been looking for this for a long
time but all efforts have proved futile. Not even the manufactures.
Also, I tried using planet phones that do not re-register when
I left the group off on this reply. The packages still win not install.
I installed the replacement package: sipx-freeswitch.i386 manually and
then tried yum install sipxecs and this package is still looking for
sipxconfig-conference.
I tried installing yum-skip-broken to see if I could install as
Hi,
I keep on seeing my phones go to registering. Then when I go to my server I
see this message:
INIT: version 2.86 reloading
After that I need to reboot my SipXecs server in order to my phones to register.
Has anybody seen this message before?
Thanks
Scott
__
Some good news for those anticipating the NAT Traversal and SIP Trunking
features of sipXecs 4.0...
Our goal was to be able to support 25 simultaneous calls (roughly the
equivalent of a T1 interface) through the packet relay that makes NAT
traversal possible. That component has been stable for so
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> Ranga - I simply pointed out the "number of connections" you indicated
> sipxbridge was designed to handle originally (I think you stated 25 or so).
> I'm glad it looks like it could handle more. Could you provide a more
> detailed expecta
Well, if any device knows a sip userid (extension), sip domain, and the
sip password it will be able to register.
You would need to do something with a firewall or access list ahead of
the sipX pbx to block unwanted traffic. (firewall of course needs to be
SIP aware).
Mike
> -Original Messa
Ranga - I simply pointed out the "number of connections" you indicated
sipxbridge was designed to handle originally (I think you stated 25 or so). I'm
glad it looks like it could handle more. Could you provide a more detailed
expectation on the wiki to clarify this?
-Original Message-
F
Hi Picher,
Question is:
I deals in wifi modem.
I have a scenario where lots of ip phone will be connected by my wifi
access point.
When a IP phone from my Access point try to register itself with my
Sipx Server then only these Phone should get registered.
But if any other company's access poin
Did you check to see how the PBX is configured? From the Admin screen,
System->Domain, make sure the domain name has your FQDN, reboot and then
you may need to delete / recreate your users (there's another way to
deal with this stuck in the wiki somewhere).
Also, once you do this you should pr
>From the Wiki:
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_localize_sipX_voice_prompts
_for_different_languages
RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bits, mono,
8000 Hz
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] O
Vikas,
Your question isn't very clear to me, could you rephrase / expand on
scenario?
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of VG
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 2:16 AM
> To
I have an almost identical setup (Mediant - SipX - Linksys) and have
music on hold working between the Linksys phones but not softphones. I
did try plumbing the earphone socket from my MP3 player into the socket
on the Mediant Gateway, which I assumed worked like old TDM switches I
have used befor
25 matches
Mail list logo
