Re: [sipx-users] How to make sipxbridge to handle REFER?

2009-04-07 Thread M. Ranganathan
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Gabor Paller wrote: > Hi, > > I just started to move to 3.11/4.0 and I heard that sipxbridge can > handle REFER on behalf of the SIP trunk or gateway. My problem is that I > am not able to activate this feature (the REFER goes to the > trunk/gateway). Is there any c

[sipx-users] How to make sipxbridge to handle REFER?

2009-04-07 Thread Gabor Paller
Hi, I just started to move to 3.11/4.0 and I heard that sipxbridge can handle REFER on behalf of the SIP trunk or gateway. My problem is that I am not able to activate this feature (the REFER goes to the trunk/gateway). Is there any common pitfall/trick that I should be aware of? Regards, Gabor _

[sipx-users] 3.11.12 Exchange UM question

2009-04-07 Thread Brett Whittaker
The dial-plan dialing work fine for reach Exchange from a Voip phone logged into SipX, and I can use the pre-configured Voicemail Dial Plan rules having configured the correct Exchange hostname and set the appropriate permissions at the User level so that from a Voip client I am able to dial int

Re: [sipx-users] "The Basics" Overview Question

2009-04-07 Thread Kevin Thorley
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 19:37 -0400, Brett Whittaker wrote: > Does anyone have a pointer to the equivalent of “Sip-X for Dummies” ? > I have been playing with Sip-X quite extensively for many months now, > versions 3.8 through to 3.11.12 Beta. Probably uninstalled each > version 2-3 times each (pro

Re: [sipx-users] T38modem and Sipx

2009-04-07 Thread Picher, Michael
The sipX box doesn't care about the T.38 media conversation at all... I've done a PRI into a Patton 4960 gateway routed through the PBX to an FXS port on another Patton 4118 gateway. Mike -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipf

Re: [sipx-users] HA sanity check

2009-04-07 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 08:59 +0100, kenny.mitch...@ineos.com wrote: > > Thanks Scott, > > the environment is a large campus switched network running over fibre > optic, there's no NAT involved at all. Likewise with our WAN, > globally we're all on the same registered IP ranges, so I'm not doing

Re: [sipx-users] "The Basics" Overview Question

2009-04-07 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 19:37 -0400, Brett Whittaker wrote: > Does anyone have a pointer to the equivalent of “Sip-X for Dummies” ? > I have been playing with Sip-X quite extensively for many months now, > versions 3.8 through to 3.11.12 Beta. Probably uninstalled each > version 2-3 times each (prob

Re: [sipx-users] schedules for time-based rules on dialplan

2009-04-07 Thread Damian Krzeminski
heros wrote: > Hi all, > I wrote a dialplan using schedules to provide time-based behaviour. > Each rules is assigned to a schedule. Basically > > Schedule "Day" (9:00-13:00 14:00-18:00) is assigned to "ruleday", > match calls from 01122334455 and dial extension 200 > > Schedule "night" (13:0

[sipx-users] Snom 320 Call History

2009-04-07 Thread Keith Gearty
This is possibly a Snom issue rather than a SipX one, but I've got a problem that dialled/received/missed calls are not being recorded in the Call History of my Snom 320's. I was wondering if anyone knows of a phone or phone group setting that I may have accidently turned off, which would caus

[sipx-users] T38modem and Sipx

2009-04-07 Thread Massimo Vignone
Hi everybody, Anyone has got some experience using t38modem (and hylafax) with a sipx HA installation? Thanks, Max -- Massimo Vignone UniMORE - Servizi Informatici - Reti e Sistemi Phone: +39.059.2058032 Fax: +39.059.2058034 sip:massimo.vign...@unimore.it ISN:8032*881 __

[sipx-users] schedules for time-based rules on dialplan

2009-04-07 Thread heros
Hi all, I wrote a dialplan using schedules to provide time-based behaviour. Each rules is assigned to a schedule. Basically Schedule "Day" (9:00-13:00 14:00-18:00) is assigned to "ruleday", match calls from 01122334455 and dial extension 200 Schedule "night" (13:00-14:00 18:00-9:00) is assign

[sipx-users] Fw: Call Resolver failed

2009-04-07 Thread Paul Scheepens
- Forwarded by Paul Scheepens/EPO on 07-04-2009 09:23 - Paul Scheepens/EPO wrote on 02-04-2009 17:31:44: > "Scott Lawrence" wrote on 02-04-2009 16:47:56: > > > On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 12:28 +0200, Paul Scheepens wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Sorry for the "subject" mix-up in my p

Re: [sipx-users] HA sanity check

2009-04-07 Thread kenny . mitchell
Thanks Scott, the environment is a large campus switched network running over fibre optic, there's no NAT involved at all. Likewise with our WAN, globally we're all on the same registered IP ranges, so I'm not doing any translations. We've got a managed RAS solution as well, remote users VPN

Re: [sipx-users] HA sanity check

2009-04-07 Thread Massimo Vignone
kenny.mitch...@ineos.com wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've been asked to write up a document comparing a possible Sip-X > install with our current telephony systems, and I just wanted to check > with you guys to see if I'm going way off the mark here. So far all I > have is a single test server run