> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Joly [mailto:rj...@nortel.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 8:21 PM
> To: Boy Aidil Sjam; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: RE: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.0 Registration status for Remote
> Workers
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have a question about reg
Tony,
Thanks for the info.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 6:59 PM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org; aidils...@prawedanet.co.id
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs 4.0 Registration status for Remote
> Work
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 15:45 +0200, Gufo wrote:
> checking for /etc/java/java.conf... no
> configure: error: Cannot system jar directory. Try to install jpackage-utils
> package.
What the ./configure is looking for is /etc/java/java.conf.
Unfortunately, the error message is not very clear and ther
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 22:11 -0300, Rudá Cunha da Silva wrote:
> I installed the version 4 and configure the SIP and created two
> extensions 200 and 201, placed the calls that come to the SIP go to
> the 200 (works fine).
>
> I can not call extension 200 and the 201 or 201 to 200.
> Installed th
Another reply to myself, as i now thought of good old strace... Which
uncovered a weirdness that
- i don't understand
- but may give a hint on finding the issue
- makes me tend to think it's a bug
See yourself, two tries to start the app by hand as user sipxchange /
UID 500:
8< -snip- 8<
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 18:06 +0200, Michael Siebecker wrote:
> Addition..
>
> If i run it as root:
>
> sipXvxml.sh -config /etc/sipxpbx/mediaserver-config
>
> it works. So i assume user sipxchange / UID 500 lacks some rights
> (running it as that user gives me same error as in webinterface).
>
Addition..
If i run it as root:
sipXvxml.sh -config /etc/sipxpbx/mediaserver-config
it works. So i assume user sipxchange / UID 500 lacks some rights
(running it as that user gives me same error as in webinterface).
Which rights could that be ?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: sipx-u
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 09:46 +0700, Boy Aidil Sjam wrote:
> 2. If a remote user registered to the server with
> “...@122.129.193.22:25666;rinstance=c70131baba02eaf3;x-sipX-privcontact=122.129.193.23%3A25666”
> status, the remote user able to call the others extension but other users
> extensi
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 09:56 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 10:24 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> > I notice that the default MOH music has changed in 4.0, and is now a
> > real piece of music that isn't painful to listen to. What is the
> > license on this default music? Is i
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Stephan W wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I set up a trunk to my SIP Provider; network traces show that SipX registers
> fine with the SIP Provider using my SIP Account .
My guess is that inbound INVITE from the iTSP is not going through
SipXbridge but rather directly to the
Hello,
I set up a trunk to my SIP Provider; network traces show that SipX registers
fine with the SIP Provider using my SIP Account .
A call coming in from the PSTN arrives at SipX with a SIP INVITE to
@. SipX replies to that with a 404 Not found.
This leads me to believe that I need t
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 10:24 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> I notice that the default MOH music has changed in 4.0, and is now a
> real piece of music that isn't painful to listen to. What is the
> license on this default music? Is it free from all requirements for
> performing rights licenses an
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 00:12 +0200, Michael Siebecker wrote:
> Thanks for your assistance...
>
> I installed on centos 5 series using yum using sipxecs stable.
> I restart all services when necessary, and also tried restart of sipxecs
> service as a whole.
>
> [r...@aao3 ~]# sipxproc --state
> {"P
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 07:25 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> I opened an issue for that and it was closed. It is suggested you get the yum
> repos for Centos and install them yourself until that is resolved. Yum is
> installed, but the repo's for Centos are not.
>
> http://track.sipfoundry.org/brow
> Hi All,
>
> I have a question about registration status in diagnostic tab
> for remote worker.
>
>
>
> 1. If a remote user registered to the server with
> "3...@114.58.107.77:26116;rinstance=61e4a43ba568d13d;x-sipX-non
at" status, the remote user able to call the others extension > a
Hello,
DNS Advisor shows an SRV RR record in the list of DNS configuration errors but
the configuration test does not show that record as missing.
Is this record not important or should this be checked by the configuration
test?
Regards
Stephan
--
Nur bis 31.05.: GMX FreeDSL Komplettanschlu
In both cases the registration is from the same IP address. In the second case
the connection says it is behind NAT and has additional information on how to
reach the phone behind NAT.
Normally you would register a phone from the LAN, and it would not be behind
NAT. In that instance the registr
Hi Matt,
I tried to used ekiga and the result still the same.
I think there's the problem from the remote ISP.
I found it because when I tried to use another ISP (we used 3G/HSDPA connection
for the remote worker), I was able to call from the remote ext. to internal
ext. and vice versa. When I l
I notice that the default MOH music has changed in 4.0, and is now a
real piece of music that isn't painful to listen to. What is the
license on this default music? Is it free from all requirements for
performing rights licenses and the like?
___
s
19 matches
Mail list logo
