On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:15 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
>> It *appears* ( I need logs to verify this) I do not correctly handle
>> the case of re-INVITes being challenged. The snapshot that you sent
>> me was not generated by sipx-snapshot. I
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 14:37 -0700, roman gelfand wrote:
> Is it possible to filter incoming calls based on from phone number /
> sip address and route them accordingly? If not, is there plans to add
> this functionality in future?
It is on the roadmap. See http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-4
Is it possible to filter incoming calls based on from phone number / sip
address and route them accordingly? If not, is there plans to add this
functionality in future?
Thanks in advance
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:15 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> It *appears* ( I need logs to verify this) I do not correctly handle
> the case of re-INVITes being challenged. The snapshot that you sent
> me was not generated by sipx-snapshot. I do not see the logs there.
I also see all your passwords (
It *appears* ( I need logs to verify this) I do not correctly handle
the case of re-INVITes being challenged. The snapshot that you sent
me was not generated by sipx-snapshot. I do not see the logs there.
Please use the sipx-snapshot command to generate the snapshot file.
Please set :
DEBUG lo
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 23:04 +0530, naga raju wrote:
> Hi all i installed tht sipx 4.0 on my fedora 8. After installation i
> run the diagnostics->configuration diagnostics. Then its giving the
> below for DNS name can suggest
> regarding DNS names?
> DNS IP:Name resolver
> 1/1/08 12:01 PM
> Erro
Hi all i installed tht sipx 4.0 on my fedora 8. After installation i run the
diagnostics->configuration diagnostics. Then its giving the below for DNS
name can suggest
regarding DNS names?
DNS IP:Name resolver
1/1/08 12:01 PM
Error
SIP route to SIP_DOMAIN_NAME does not match the configured IP
Thanks for all of the feedback!
At this point we've got good reviews for the Snom DECT phones, Nokia E
series phones (specifically E51, E65 and E90) and iPhone or iPod Touch with
SipPhone from vnet corp.
We have a small office and don't really use our Wi-Fi for anything else, so
I think we'
You can use it on an iPod Touch also... Just need a headset with a
Microphone for the Touch. I'd own one now if they had Bluetooth turned
on (the chip is in there...).
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Todd Hodgen
Sent: T
I have a customer that is using a SIP client on their IPhone, with excellent
results. The client is from here - http://www.vnet-corp.com/index.htm
He called me from a Starbucks store a few weeks ago, tunneled to his office
via pptp, out his sip trunk, into my SipFoundry via a SIP trunk. Call
I'm running a test with Polycom Soundpoint 320, 501 and 650.
SipX gives this error as well...
Starting DHCP server test.
Socket Bind Exception: Address already in use
DHCPACK responce received.
Message Type: DHCPACK
Server Identifier: 192.168.10.133
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
Router: 192.
Hi,
I tried both Nokia E51 and E90 and I confirm it to be a nice wifi sip
device. It's not perfect unfortunately. I had some issues with blind
transfers directed to them. Then I believe it does not support dns SRV
records.
Alberto
Gabor Paller ha scritto:
Personal experience: we use both No
Personal experience: we use both Nokia E65 and E90 over Wi-Fi with SipX
and they work just fine. No additional software is necessary. I guess,
Nokia E category phones all have the SIP client in them but I have
experience only with the two models above.
Regards,
Gabor
__
Wi-Fi and SIP do not seem to mix very well. I used Linksys wireless
adaptors on a job recently, linking into a Cisco WLAN and got rather mixed
results. All the wireless SIP phones I've tried have not been worth the
money, and the wireless adaptors proved to be rather fragile, with 2 out
of tw
My recommendations would be do something else. I've had 3 wi-fi phones. Hitachi
(no longer made, difficult to use, but overall very compatible), Linksys
(strange stuff happens, not good battery life, and two iPaq's (both models were
cell phone and wifi, one with built-in client that had an impos
We have sipXecs up and running and have Polycom SoundPoint and Linksys
SPA3102 devices. One of my co-workers would like to use a Wi-Fi device.
Preferably, she would like to buy a new cell that has Wi-Fi with a SIP
client. Does anyone have any recommendations or comments about this?
Thanks,
Tim
Appreciated !
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 8:55 PM
To: jcanfi...@emstar.com
Cc: mpic...@cmctechgroup.com; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org;
jun@msn.com
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Entries of intranet subnets of
R
We reinstalled a 3.10 system with 4.0 from ISO, and upgraded to 4.01. In both
4.0/4.01 we started seeing issues with CDR's for calls showing "Failed".
The only calls marked successful were calls to internal users, media server,
etc.
We are using sip trunking with an Ingate as an unmanaged gateway
Matus wrote:
> hmm, so i try svn and rpm sources and still having same problem with
> sipXconfig
> only:
>
> checking for build-classpath... no
> ./configure: line 3618: sed: command not found
> checking for /usr/share/java//sipx-jasperreports-deps... ./configure: line
> 3621: ${+set}: bad subs
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Gabor Paller wrote:
> SipXbridge is used in a scenario when the caller receives a re-INVITE
> from the called party. The SIP trunk challenges the re-INVITE. The
> result is that sipxbridge throws an exception (see attached log) and
> fails the call.
>
> Any idea, how
The remote takes on the IP address of the remote public IP as seen by
sipxbridge. At least that's what I believe.
>>> Jim Canfield 07/07/09 8:26 AM >>>
Just out of curiosity, what happens in when you have a scenario where
a remote worker happens to have a subnet matching an intranet entry?
On T
Just out of curiosity, what happens in when you have a scenario where
a remote worker happens to have a subnet matching an intranet entry?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Tony
Graziano wrote:
> I think if the site he is on is 192.168.2.x and there is a remotely connected
> subnet via site-to-site
hmm, so i try svn and rpm sources and still having same problem with sipXconfig
only:
checking for build-classpath... no
./configure: line 3618: sed: command not found
checking for /usr/share/java//sipx-jasperreports-deps... ./configure: line
3621: ${+set}: bad substitution
./configure: line 362
SipXbridge is used in a scenario when the caller receives a re-INVITE
from the called party. The SIP trunk challenges the re-INVITE. The
result is that sipxbridge throws an exception (see attached log) and
fails the call.
Any idea, how to correct this? It happens in 4.0.1.
Regards, Gabor
AUS-VM
Hi,
Please refer XX-5740(HA : services with registered distributor server
does not start untill the profile is sent for second time).
Thanks,
Sathya
Rene Pankratz wrote:
Output of sipxproc got lost, sorry.
Here it is:
# sipxproc
{"FreeSWITCH"=>"Disabled",
"sipXmrtg"=>"Disabled",
"SIPRegi
I think if the site he is on is 192.168.2.x and there is a remotely connected
subnet via site-to-site VPN of 192.168.3.x, both need to be listed in sipx,
since they router privately to each other.
If the remote site is a remote "user" and not connected via site-to-site VPN,
the remote subnet sho
Output of sipxproc got lost, sorry.
Here it is:
# sipxproc
{"FreeSWITCH"=>"Disabled",
"sipXmrtg"=>"Disabled",
"SIPRegistrar"=>"Disabled",
"ParkServer"=>"Disabled",
"ConfigAgent"=>"Disabled",
"CallResolver"=>"Disabled",
"ACDServer"=>"Disabled",
"SIPStatus"=>"Disabled",
"ConfigServer"=>"Disa
I think you need to rephrase this... I don't really understand the
question.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of jun,wen
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 2:54 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Entries
1stomni wrote:
> Hi all
> where can i download 4.0.1 sources, on /pub/ there is only binary files for
> some distrubution, i'm running gentoo and i would like to compile my own
> binaries.
> I try svn version but for some strange reasons sipXconfig is unable to
> combile,
> so im looking for sta
Hi all
where can i download 4.0.1 sources, on /pub/ there is only binary files for
some distrubution, i'm running gentoo and i would like to compile my own
binaries.
I try svn version but for some strange reasons sipXconfig is unable to combile,
so im looking for stable 4.0.1 source files.
thank
30 matches
Mail list logo
