We generally use two different scenarios. Both use encryption/client
certificate authentication thus eliminating the need for usernames and
passwords.
Remote office:
OpenVPN tunnel between firewall devices (Usually a linux appliance). Local
DNS and DHCP services point to remote sipX server allowi
Hahaha...
You were a technical editor :-)
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 6:13 PM
To: Picher, Michael; nwatk...@garrettcounty.org; li...@grounded.net;
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Ty
Oops.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427
Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethel
Editor Fail... :-)
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel
Watkins
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:09 PM
To: li...@grounded.net; sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Typo In sipX book (For Mich
Thanks Josh... I noticed that the other day... when I was using the
book as a resource! :-)
Thanks again.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh Patten
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 11:57
> I use openVPN almost exclusively. Works great, but the only drawback I
> have found so far is that is no good way to do dhcp-relay. If this were
> possible, it would make the remote phone setup trivial. If anyone has or
> knows a way to do this, I'd love to hear about it.
Oops, thought I read
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:29:16 -0500, Jim Canfield wrote:
> I use openVPN almost exclusively. Works great, but the only drawback I
> have found so far is that is no good way to do dhcp-relay. If this were
> possible, it would make the remote phone setup trivial. If anyone has or
> knows a way to do
I use openVPN almost exclusively. Works great, but the only drawback I have
found so far is that is no good way to do dhcp-relay. If this were
possible, it would make the remote phone setup trivial. If anyone has or
knows a way to do this, I'd love to hear about it.
-Jim
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
> James Johnson
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 2:31 PM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: [sipx-users] Auto Attendant
>
> How do I set up so w
How do I set up so when you call a number and the auto attendant
answers. And you press 0 it transfers you to an extension?
..
James
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-user
Yup. I'm pleased as punch with ALIX.2D3 boards running Vyatta VC 5.02
on compact flash for remote users. It's good for one or two concurrent
calls over OpenVPN, provides some QOS and acts as a general internet
firewall/nat router. Even supports VLANs. If you want, you can also run
pfSence on the
Has anyone found a good robust call accounting software that works with
SIPX besides the RSI product. I am looking for something that can
schedule reports and email them out for an executive suites environment
Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 12:55 -0400, Dale Worley wrote:
> > > the main users screen if you are running 4.02 (which I am) that
> allows
>
> Strictly speaking, you are running version "4.0.2", which is a
> sub-version of the "4.0" family.
It's a common misnomer on this list to refer to version '4.02'
Is anyone using OpenVPN for remote phone users?
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX --
Has anyone used this product with Polycom Phones and Sipx?
I am interested to know how well it works...I expect Active Directory
integration to be better within Sipx, but am curious.
Thank You,
Austin
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@li
I purchased the book last week - it's a great way to show some of the naysayers
that open source is a valid option...
"Look there is even a real book"...albeit with a typo :)
Nathaniel
-Original Message-
From: li...@grounded.net [mailto:li...@grounded.net]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 200
> > the main users screen if you are running 4.02 (which I am) that allows
Strictly speaking, you are running version "4.0.2", which is a
sub-version of the "4.0" family.
Dale
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: ht
So that '0' is there for a reason :)
I'll try to pay better attention next time.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 11:53 AM
To: Nathaniel Watkins
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users]
> with sipXecs 4.0" the bullet point "Utilizing the conference service"
> the word conference is misspelled as "cnference"
> Just thought you should know.
Oh no!!! We bought the PDF and I'm wanting to buy the book too but now, I don't
know :).
Ya, it's a very useful book by someone who has a lot
On page 227 of the book "Building Enterprise Ready Telephony Systems
with sipXecs 4.0" the bullet point "Utilizing the conference service"
the word conference is misspelled as "cnference"
Just thought you should know.
FYI everyone should buy this book. It really is a great resource.
_
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 11:36 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> I just happened upon this URL:
> http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Bridged_Line_Appearance
>
> It looks like there should be a checkbox labeled 'shared' somewhere on
> the main users screen if you are running 4.02 (which I am) that
I just happened upon this URL:
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Bridged_Line_Appearance
It looks like there should be a checkbox labeled 'shared' somewhere on
the main users screen if you are running 4.02 (which I am) that allows
you to setup a user as a shared user (and allow you to put the
Below, is the java error I am getting when processing an inbound call.
"2009-10-02T14:02:35.976000Z":462:INCOMING:INFO:sipx.sipserv.com:UDPMessageChannelThread::sipXbridge:"Read
SIP Message :\nRemote Host:204.11.192.22 Port:
5080\nNOTIFY sip:1999...@999.999.999.999:5080;tr
After upgrading from 4.0.1-015823 to 4.0.2-016420 using yum, I get
the following message on sipxconfig web site:
New software updates available
The package information was last updated Oct 2, 2009 8:16 AM.
Could not determine system's version
Update details:
sipxecs 4.0.2-016420
I have tried t
HI all,
I use 4.0.2 from iso.
I encountered the problem that every time I click "System->
Servers->Services" page, the UI "hangs" for a minute or two, then works ok.
Here is what "top" shows (I have dual core xeon 2.33GHz):
top - 12:14:49 up 17 days, 22:34, 3 users, load average: 0.47, 0.3
I noticed exactly the same problem in 4.0.2 when restarting the whole
sipxecs.
I voted for XX-4869.
Rgds, Nikolay.
_
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of James R
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 11:26 PM
To: Dani
I think your best bet would be to simply replace the system with a
modern installation of SipXecs. The latest stable ISO version (4.0.2)
would be the one you want. Unlike SCS, SipXecs is professional quality
open source freeware. You just download the ISO file, burn it to CD,
put it into the
27 matches
Mail list logo
