This almost always is a problem with DNS. Did you set up all of the SRV
records and A records as specified in the DNS advisor? Are your Windows
2003 DNS server permissions set to allow queries from the secondary server?
sipx-users-requ...@list.sipfoundry.org wrote:
> Subject:
> [sipx-users] issu
Good Day,
I have been trying to cluster a couple of SIPX servers (4.0.2); but having the
same issue over and over again. I am wondering if anyone can point me to the
right direction,
I am using an external windows 2003 server as my DNS. My master SIPX server is
configured to use its local re
Anyone using a Jasomi PeerPoint c100 SBC. I'm trying to find the manual so
that I can reset the password.
Mike
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://
>> -NI2 support seems to be somewhat lacking but improving. This is
My provider PRI is NI2, is the audiocodes a problem?
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe:
AudioCodes is supported and really easy to setup with sipx.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 6:54 PM, li...@grounded.net wrote:
> So if I get rid of this blasted vegastream, how hard is it to get a mediant
> 2000 online real fast since I've never used one yet. In other words, would
> there be anyone here
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:51:01 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Its not asterisk. You don't really expect all software packages to have the
> exact same functionality.
That wasn't what I'm implying, just that users I would be move from asterisk
are used to having the emails. They would not be able to
I have had 3 Power supplies die on my AudioCodes MK1. I am on my forth.
Support is not good. Cannot deal directly with AudioCodes and have to deal
with reseller and 3 weeks support. If you go with AudioCodes, I would
strongly suggest having a backup and getting Next Business Day support.
On Sat,
Its not asterisk. You don't really expect all software packages to have the
exact same functionality.
The bit about exposing the functionality through sipxconfig is a primary
goal of the project (wiki).
The beautiful thing about software and open source is that you have a choice
you can exercise.
So if I get rid of this blasted vegastream, how hard is it to get a mediant
2000 online real fast since I've never used one yet. In other words, would
there be anyone here that might be able to help me get it online to replace
this thing?
Thanks.
Mike
I understand what you're saying but I can't agree to all of what you said :).
Outgoing server name, URL's, reply to address, look of such a form/email,
those things should be a given.
> functionality that should be there it is built into the system after a
> review and "polls" or "votes" throug
I just tried to do a yum update and found that I couldn't
because it failed to find any repos for 5.2. I remember that there was a
lengthy thread about the 4.0.2 upgrade breaking yum, but I didn't know
that it had bit me until now.
Here's some relevant info about my system (from memory, so might
I forgot to mention I had sent profiles several times before over a
period of several months on all the sipX components in an attempt to fix
the previous problems, to no avail. What essentially fixed the issue was
clearing out and re-entering all of the intranet information in
System>>Internet
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Josh Patten wrote:
> Well it seems I found out why this was happening, and it was related to
> sipXbridge and the media relay.
>
> Even though I had my domains and subnets defined in System>>Internet
> Calling, sipX was sending all my sip and media session to my s
Well it seems I found out why this was happening, and it was related to
sipXbridge and the media relay.
Even though I had my domains and subnets defined in System>>Internet
Calling, sipX was sending all my sip and media session to my sipX
installations' external address (1-to-1 NAT) which then
I used the ISO to install so guess I'd have to download all of the source? I
can't believe it's this much work just to change a few small things that
should never have been hard coded.
Is there anyone who might already have the code who could make these changes
for me perhaps?
Mike
On Fri, 3
I too can't wait for 4.2's new voice mail system.. I have one extension
that the mailbox needed customization. The rest of the mailboxes needed
to use the default template.
I was able to get it working by first setting up the personal
autoattendant on the custom extension with a dummy rule that
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Josh Patten wrote:
> My question to the members of this list is: Which gateway would you
> choose for ISDN/PRI for sipX: Cisco, Patton or Audiocodes, and reasons
> why you would choose them over each other.
+1 For Patton
Pros
- Great Support
- Flexible configura
hmm... are you using esxi or esx? We are using esxi 3.5.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Graziano"
To: fti...@toqen.com
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 10:06:46 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs behind endian firewall
I did mine by unzipping it in my datastore. Then I added to inventory and it
picked up the config file and it booted.
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpde
Tony,
I have downloaded the vmware version of pfsense. i tried opening it but i get
this error: Power On virtual machine
New Virtual Machine Failed to open disk scsi0:0:
"Unsupported and/or invalid disk type 7. Did you forget to import the disk
first?
Unable to create virtual SCSIdevice for
ok just a quick update. I tried installing the newer version of endian, 2.3.
Now I can get both extensions to ring. i can also see when i log into my itsp
provider, gafachi, that it has registered my server and can see it (it's at
port 5080 instead of 5060).
although i still cannot make phone
Audiocodes work well enough but support is horrible! I can not stress how bad
support is.
Audiocodes has no advanced replacement support and you must work through your
reseller/distrubtor for support. You can not call them directly.
I had a customer have his audiocodes die...we had to ship
Jeff,
Under the Devices menu you can upload the Polycom firmware zip files.
>From polycom download the 3.1.3c split file and the 4.2 bootrom. These
zip files can be put together in a Polycom device files entry.
HTH.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Patton.
If I were you I'd choose it just because it's damn close to my last
name.
Kidding aside... Technical support is the biggie. Flexibility of the
unit is another.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org]
Except you missed a step...
You needed to be looking at this page first...
http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipXecs_4.0.1_Upgrade
The 4.0.2 upgrade instructions really are for 4.0.x to 4.0.2.
Do the following:
* service sipxecs stop
* yum install sipxecs (28 packages ~1
Hi, I had a similar problem last week. My phone kept on hanging at the welcome
screen. After some debugging I saw that sipXecs had a problem with the old
Polycom Firmware. I upgraded to bootrom 4.2 and firmware 3.1.3RevC on my
Polycom phone and it worked fine. Don't upgrade to 3.2.1 since this c
26 matches
Mail list logo
