Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

Right, didn't think about using the ITSP address instead of the Cisco gateway address. I guess I'm just used to working with PSTN gateways. Thanks for catching that one. Also wasn't aware of conntrack. Shows how much I work with iptables. Try that same rule I posted earlier except use the add

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

FWIW using NAT rules in iptables is not exactly 'turning on the firewall', but you should be careful to unload the SIP NAT modules. The other problem is I'd think you'd want that example rule below to apply to the ip of your ITSP (the -s field) rather than your cisco, the source address of SIP

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

Tested the iptables configure as recommended and it did not work Hiral Patel, Operations Manager OnRelay Elizabeth House | 39 York Road, London SE1 7NQ, UK | +44 (0) 2079028138| hiral.pa...@onrelay.com | www.onrelay.com | This electronic message transmission contains information from OnRelay,

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

Hi tony, Why would you not recommend enabling a firewall on sipX, is this not supported configuration by sipX? Regards, Hiral Patel, Operations Manager OnRelay Elizabeth House | 39 York Road, London SE1 7NQ, UK | +44 (0) 2079028138| hiral.pa...@onrelay.com | www.onrelay.com | This electronic

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

Thanks, I have already seen that link, this is not an option for me as it is not supported configuration! I still have not got an answer from anyone about the configuration I suggested? Hiral Patel, Operations Manager OnRelay Elizabeth House | 39 York Road, London SE1 7NQ, UK | +44 (0) 20790281

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

FYI, Here was the specific answer I got when I asked about trying to change ports around for the exact same reason. http://www.mail-archive.com/sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org/msg08724.html On 2/2/2010 7:46 PM, Hiral Patel wrote: > Thanks for your input, and that is my option two - the Cisco rout

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

I would not turn a firewall on in sipx. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: ht

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

I don't know how well that iptables scenario will work with remote workers. Do your remote workers come in on the same Cisco router as your SIP trunk(s)? Josh Patten wrote: You could probably use iptables (should already be installed on your sipX box) to accomplish this. Use webmin (http:/

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

You could probably use iptables (should already be installed on your sipX box) to accomplish this. Use webmin (http://www.webmin.com download and install the RPM) to set up iptables (networking->linux firewall->allow all traffic) and then try adding/replacing the following lines to the top of y

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

We will have to support remote works Hiral Patel, Operations Manager OnRelay Elizabeth House | 39 York Road, London SE1 7NQ, UK | +44 (0) 2079028138| hiral.pa...@onrelay.com | www.onrelay.com | This electronic message transmission contains information from OnRelay, Ltd., that may be confidenti

Re: [sipx-users] upgrading CENTOS 4.04 distro to 4.2? ish

In "either" instance, its a yum update. Yes, I'm sure the schema changes. Yes, a backup is best to perform before upgrading. 4.1 is the "unstable" development version which will be 4.2 and made available as stable at some point. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.98

Re: [sipx-users] upgrading CENTOS 4.04 distro to 4.2? ish

A key point here - "stable". Just in case there was a thought that there was a stable version for this. There is no stable release in 4.2 or 4.1 anything. All 4.1.? is unstable development code. 4.2 or whatever they call it at release time will be stable at that point, but it is not available

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

Additionally the alg on the cisco might cause an issue. Again, I don't think you can get there from here. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephon

Re: [sipx-users] ITSP in -> ITSP out, via sipX forwarding. How many trunks does it consume?

2 Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

That is outside of my skill set, but I was advised against attempting something similar when I ran into the issue. We translate 5060 to 5080 on traffic from the Verizon SBC. That has worked fine for us. They were not able to alter the port for a particular customer either. Sent via BlackBerry fr

[sipx-users] ITSP in -> ITSP out, via sipX forwarding. How many trunks does it consume?

If a call comes in from an ITSP and sipX forwards it back to another outside number via the same ITSP, will this call: A. Consume two trunks, or B. Consume zero trunk because the ITSP can automagically hook up the original caller to the final destination and avoid the loop to our

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

Are you going to support remote users? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: htt

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

Thanks for your input, and that is my option two - the Cisco router which terminates the SIP trunk has feature called ALG (application level gateway) running to handle NAT from LAN to WAN. I don't want to break that, I may test this and see what happens. Do you know if my original suggestion will

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

The only way to do this is via a firewall statement which you do nove the ability to change. If your itsp was sending always from a particular address you could use a port address translation statement or change the destination port based on the source ip/network. Remote users would not be support

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

If you have control of the LAN, ca you add a router that can do a port translation? I had a similar issue. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: "Hiral Patel" Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:37:16 To: Tony Graziano; Cc: Dwayne Kee; Gabor Paller; Subject: Re: [sipx-use

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

Hey Tony, Thanks for replying so fast, I can not get a new ITSP unfortunately so I have to find a solution! I should have mentioned that the SIP trunk I have is a dedicated WAN link into the Tier 1 Operator network the network side is connect to a Acme Packet SBC (its like a standard product they

Re: [sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

Your best option is to get a new itsp. Then use a real firewall, your hands are REALLY tied. You would have to run 2 instances of sipxbridge with 2 different public ip addresses (one for remote users, the other for trunking). Since that means firewall changes you can't make, you are STUCK. Fire t

[sipx-users] SipXbridge 5060 and sipXpbx 5060 how?

Hello All, Purpose: Need to enable SipXecs bridge to solve lack of REFER support on SIP trunk. Problem: 1. SIP trunk provider has very strict rules about changing any configuration on any component that they manage. The SIP trunk comes with a Cisco 2801 router which is managed by the Operator a

Re: [sipx-users] Odd message when updating Centos with YUM today

No. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

Re: [sipx-users] upgrading CENTOS 4.04 distro to 4.2? ish

Not sure it matters since the rpm's haven't been publicly available for almost 6 weeks now either. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.

[sipx-users] Odd message when updating Centos with YUM today

I try to regularly update my CentOS system (installed from ISO) to pick up security fixes and such. When I did it today, I got an odd warning message in the Yum output: Updating : selinux-policy-targeted 3/49 sipxchange homedir /etc/sipxpbx or its parent directory conflicts with a defi

Re: [sipx-users] upgrading CENTOS 4.04 distro to 4.2? ish

Not sure how clean the upgrade is at this point. That's one of the last things that is focused on. 4.odd numbers are all dev releases... not for production use. 4.even numbers are stable releases. More gremlins of course. More is always better right? Not... From: sipx-users-boun...

Re: [sipx-users] outbound caller-id

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: > Oops – I didn’t mean to hit send without an explanation. I’m using > callwithus to do some testing. Apparently sipx is using: 546378905 as the > caller-id (which happens to be the sip username for callwithus). I previously > had the c

[sipx-users] upgrading CENTOS 4.04 distro to 4.2? ish

What would be the procedures to taking a running sipxecs, from the CENTOS ISO with 4.04 and downloading a stable (4.1x?) or 4.2 version. I assume the upgrade is oneway, with sql schema's changing, right? This uses a newer AA? Less gremlins? or more? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Phone: 561-999-500

Re: [sipx-users] outbound caller-id

Oops – I didn’t mean to hit send without an explanation. I’m using callwithus to do some testing. Apparently sipx is using: 546378905 as the caller-id (which happens to be the sip username for callwithus). I previously had the caller-id working properly based on the gateway and transforming th

[sipx-users] outbound caller-id

Nathaniel Watkins IT Director Garrett County Government 316 East Alder Street, Suite 2 Oakland, MD 21550 Telephone: 301-334-5001 Fax: 301-334-5021 E-mail: nwatk...@garrettcounty.org From: CallWithUs support [mailto:supp...@callwithus.com] Sent: Tuesday, Februa

Re: [sipx-users] Odd voicemail issue

>>> On 2/2/2010 at 03:38 PM, in message >>> <92ac590d1002021238ya3a0c3dnf512271855f77...@mail.gmail.com>, Tim Byng >>> wrote: >>> >>>Note: I wanted to post this in the forum under the original thread, but kept >>>getting an invalid posting password error. I don't see the posting password >>>fi

Re: [sipx-users] Odd voicemail issue

Note: I wanted to post this in the forum under the original thread, but kept getting an invalid posting password error. I don't see the posting password field on newer threads. Maybe I can't reply because the thread is so old? Please see the following thread for more info: http://forum.sipfoundry.o

Re: [sipx-users] Clear Sipx Logs

Now that is an excellent command to know. -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Scott Lawrence Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:40 AM To: Tony Graziano Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subje

Re: [sipx-users] Clear Sipx Logs

On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 13:27 -0600, Austin Curry wrote: > Does anyone know a way to clear out the sipxecs logs (call resolver, > sipxbridge, etc) for a clean logging slate? \rm -f /var/log/sipxecs/*log Dale ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.

Re: [sipx-users] Clear Sipx Logs

On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 14:28 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > cd /var/log/sipxpbx > rm *.log (answer "y" when prompted) a little better... logrotate -f /etc/logrotate.d/sipxchange that preserves the old logs. This is what happens once per day from a cron job, but limited to just the sipXec

Re: [sipx-users] Clear Sipx Logs

The log files get automatically recreated on the next write w/o the daemons being restarted. Freeswitch's log is an exception to this general rule, if you unlink freeswitch's log it will continue to write to the unlinked file and you will get no log data until you restart it. -Eric On Feb 2,

Re: [sipx-users] Clear Sipx Logs

That's what I wanted to do, but didn't know if it would impact running services. Thanks, Austin From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:28 PM To: Austin Curry Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subje

Re: [sipx-users] Clear Sipx Logs

cd /var/log/sipxpbx rm *.log (answer "y" when prompted) On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Austin Curry wrote: > Does anyone know a way to clear out the sipxecs logs (call resolver, > sipxbridge, etc) for a clean logging slate? > > > > Thanks > > > > Austin > >

[sipx-users] Clear Sipx Logs

Does anyone know a way to clear out the sipxecs logs (call resolver, sipxbridge, etc) for a clean logging slate? Thanks Austin ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] AudioCodes MP-202 - work okay with sipX?

That certainly makes sense - it sucks - but it is what it is... -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 12:51 PM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.

Re: [sipx-users] AudioCodes MP-202 - work okay with sipX?

That is what I was told anyway: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/msg18577.html and it made sense to me. I kept a single PRI at my corporate office and moved all our analog traffic to it as well as made it an emergency line for sipx. On 2/2/2010 11:45 AM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: > G

Re: [sipx-users] AudioCodes MP-202 - work okay with sipX?

Glad I asked the question! I'll do some more poking around to see what other options we have. Thanks guys! -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, February 02,

Re: [sipx-users] AudioCodes MP-202 - work okay with sipX?

Yes. There is a big difference. I made the same assumption. Faxing over voip uses a established protocol. Not true for modems. I believe the codecs built around voice do not work at all with data transmission. Someone is welcome to correct me if I"m mistaken. On 2/2/2010 11:24 AM, Nathaniel Wat

[sipx-users] ** Security issue with Bandwidth.com **

I just found a major security issue with 2 systems using Bandwidth.com. The end users are unrelated. The issue is with Bandwidth's Edgemarc. Bandwidth.com has opened port 5060 to the entire Internet, unrestricted, and forwards anything received on 5060 to the cutomer's PBX, router, gateway,

Re: [sipx-users] AudioCodes MP-202 - work okay with sipX?

Tony, I'm hoping to use these devices to interface with a fuel system that utilize modems. Is there any issue with running a dial-up modem over voip? I'm assuming there isn't much difference from a fax machine - but am not positive. -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgra

Re: [sipx-users] AudioCodes MP-202 - work okay with sipX?

Thanks - I'll do some price checking on that as well. Nathaniel Watkins IT Director Garrett County Government 316 East Alder Street, Suite 2 Oakland, MD  21550 Telephone: 301-334-5001 Fax: 301-334-5021 E-mail: nwatk...@garrettcounty.org -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgra

Re: [sipx-users] AudioCodes MP-202 - work okay with sipX?

Patton makes a 2 port device also. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://

Re: [sipx-users] nortel scs vs sipx..?

There is this: http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Nortel_SCS500_vs._sipXecs_Comparison On 2/2/2010 10:43 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: More of a general question, I find the sipxecs an increadably powerful product, but our company is looking for a 'plug and play', product with some of the co

[sipx-users] AudioCodes MP-202 - work okay with sipX?

I have several sites that only need 1 or 2 analog connections to sipx - the mp-114 fxs devices are a bit more than I'd like to spend for these remotes. Does anyone know if the MP-202 telephone adapters work properly with sipx? Thanks Nathaniel This message and

[sipx-users] nortel scs vs sipx..?

More of a general question, I find the sipxecs an increadably powerful product, but our company is looking for a 'plug and play', product with some of the commercial 'pretties'. Does anyone have a list of where Nortel SCS differs from the sipx 4.04? From their web site, I can see at least it

Re: [sipx-users] Simplify, Simplify, Simplify

Great news. Thanks for the heads up, Todd. I'll check it out. -Original Message- From: Todd Hodgen [mailto:thod...@verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 12:27 AM To: Jake Ballamis; 'sipXecs users' Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Simplify, Simplify, Simplify MOH is changed dramaticall

Re: [sipx-users] "media release" support

Boss is now 'sold' on using the emergency POTS line as a backup. I just needed to take a different angle :) Thanks. On 2/1/2010 7:23 PM, mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks. Tools for my toolbox is what I need right now. > I guess I'm looking for that perfect mix of decentralized vs > cent

Re: [sipx-users] Intermittant problem - working time attendant

Ok, thanks. I'll try to get a trace. *Vänliga Hälsningar/Best Regards* /Ola Samuelson/ 2010-02-02 15:49, Scott Lawrence skrev: On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 15:33 +0100, Ola Samuelson wrote: Hi all! On one 4.0.4 system the working time attendant is set 8am to 5pm weekdays. Sat/Sun unchecked and

Re: [sipx-users] Intermittant problem - working time attendant

On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 15:33 +0100, Ola Samuelson wrote: > Hi all! > On one 4.0.4 system the working time attendant is set 8am to 5pm > weekdays. > Sat/Sun unchecked and afterhours attendant used as default and holiday > attendant. > > Intermittantly any time of day this fails. > > Examples: > -

[sipx-users] Intermittant problem - working time attendant

Hi all! On one 4.0.4 system the working time attendant is set 8am to 5pm weekdays. Sat/Sun unchecked and afterhours attendant used as default and holiday attendant. Intermittantly any time of day this fails. Examples: - working time attendant answers on a sunday. - after hours attendant answer

Re: [sipx-users] "media release" support

2 remote sites need immediate setup.120 or so long term, but there is no timetable for those. There is no driving force. They are being converted to VOIP with FSO devices owned by verizon. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: "Todd Hodgen" Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 2