A question to those of you that were having stuck parking slot problems
in 4.0.x: are you still experiencing stuck park queues? If so, is it
more or less frequent or about the same? Just wanting to know what to
expect when I upgrade.
Thanks.
___
sipx-
I know Audiocodes gateways/ATA's have v.21-v.34 modem relay built in but
I've never had an opportunity to test it before. perhaps I'll set up and
play with it soon and post success/fail results.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 5/13/2010 4:43
I don't know if it matters, I've never seen a modem call work worth a
hoot. Either get thee a CC terminal with Ethernet (yes they have them,
but they do fallback to modem as backup if the Internet is down) or
use a POTS line.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Justin Menga wrote:
> As
> per http://
As per
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps514/products_configuration_example09186a00800d698e.shtmlthe
Cisco ATA 186 is not supported for analog modem calls
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Ken Fulmer <
kenful...@icstechnologysolutions.com> wrote:
> We are having a problem with Cis
Yes, we are using v4.2.
I familiar with Freeswitch. I've been trying to understand how sipX is
integrating with Freeswitch for things like MoH. I've found the FS directory
in /etc/sipxpbx, but don't know how it's getting referenced within sipX.
Ken
From: Justin Menga [mailto:justin.me.
Are you using SIPXecs 4.2?
Doesn't the Freeswitch Voicemail implementation in SIPXecs 4.2 store all
prompts in various codec formats (rather than transcoding them on the fly)?
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Ken Fulmer <
kenful...@icstechnologysolutions.com> wrote:
> True, but there are music f
modems over sip sucketh. dont do that.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 5/13/10 3:20 PM, Ken Fulmer wrote:
>
> We are having a problem with Cisco ATA 186 and a credit card terminal. We’re
> using sipXbridge to terminate a sip trunk from the carrier. It takes about
>
Yes, if you starting swapping out RAM or have prolonged periods of CPU
usage it would be cause for concern.
What you are seeing is classified as "normal". A long, long time ago,
on a sipx version far removed from here... I learned WAY more than I
cared to about the way Java allocates memory. So mu
On 5/13/10 3:20 PM, Ken Fulmer wrote:
We are having a problem with Cisco ATA 186 and a credit card terminal.
We're using sipXbridge to terminate a sip trunk from the carrier. It
takes about ten attempts to get a card to swipe. Faxes work properly,
however.
a CC terminal communicates via mod
As a general rule, Linux will allocate *all* of memory. Among other uses, it
retains in memory copies of recently accessed disk blocks. So the fact that
the "free memory" number is near zero is not important. The critical question
is whether the paging rate is greater than 0. If paging is ha
We are having a problem with Cisco ATA 186 and a credit card terminal. We're
using sipXbridge to terminate a sip trunk from the carrier. It takes about
ten attempts to get a card to swipe. Faxes work properly, however.
Has anyone else seen as issue like this? Are there certain settings that
ne
Actually, it's hard to tell. The numbers I'm seeing are at the very top of
the screen when I enter the Top command. But I'm also seeing them with the
command, Free -m.
Ken
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitc
Which process is using all the memory?
On 5/13/2010 12:53 PM, Ken Fulmer wrote:
When we SSH into our 4.2 server and use Top or Free --m, we see almost
all of our 2 GB of RAM used. We are showing only 56 MB of RAM available.
We have another system with 4 GB RAM and it shows 3.1 GB RAM used an
When we SSH into our 4.2 server and use Top or Free -m, we see almost all of
our 2 GB of RAM used. We are showing only 56 MB of RAM available.
We have another system with 4 GB RAM and it shows 3.1 GB RAM used and 125 MB
RAM as free.
Does anyone know how these numbers are possible? Does th
It's a common mistake for people to think that they don't need DNS servers
because they are local to the sipXecs server. DNS is an extremely
important facet of the installation, and the most misunderstood part of the
equation.
DNS is essential to it working. If you configure for an external
On 5/12/10 7:23 PM, Picher, Michael wrote:
That's for digging for that one Robert!
Sounds like passing back through to Cisco engineering would be worth it
if anybody here has a Cisco support contract on their phones.
Mike
If the latest firmware (-12) doesn't fix it, then I would say this do
Not a dumb question at all.
It isn't my choice here. The main app the company uses is proprietary
and integrates tightly with Rightfax. Rightfax is a PITA to configure
and very pricey. Not my call or my $ here.
On 5/13/2010 8:00 AM, shouldbe q931 wrote:
> Probably a dumb question, but if its onl
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Matt White wrote:
> FYI...these are a 4.2.1 built with lazieburds patches...so a big thanks to
> him!
Thanks Matt! SuSe support will be fantastic, thanks for your hard
work. With a build loop and user base in place, SuSe support should
solid. As soon as Matt give
True, but there are music files encoded specifically for 729. Problem is,
the system won't allow them to be uploaded.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: JOLY, ROBERT (ROBERT) [mailto:rj...@avaya.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 8:46 AM
To: Ken Fulmer; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: R
> We are transcoding 711 to 729 for calls to the PSTN. Music on
> Hold sounds choppy to the remote side.
>
>
>
> Is there a way to tweak the system so it will accept wav
> files recorded in a more 729 friendly format?
G.729 exploits attributes of the human speech to do compression while
m
We are transcoding 711 to 729 for calls to the PSTN. Music on Hold sounds
choppy to the remote side.
Is there a way to tweak the system so it will accept wav files recorded in a
more 729 friendly format?
Thanks,
Ken Fulmer
___
sipx-users
We now have SuSe builds working fairly well and I invite people to begin
testing and let me know if you find any issues. Initial test look good but
have not tested all the features.
You can find them here:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/sipfoundry:/test/
Builds are both 64
Probably a dumb question, but if its only a small portion of people,
why not go for a hosted fax solution, one that does fax to email
inbound, and email or print driver for fax outbound ?
The last time I installed Rightfax (While working for a Rightfax
partner), It was lovely, and had a pricetag t
What do you mean you don't need DNS servers?
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuserV4r0/DHCP+and+DNS+Server+Conf
iguration
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuser/DNS+Concepts+for+sipXecs
The wiki is your friend Nalbi.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuserV4r2/Remote+User+NAT+Traversal
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Nalbi Tahawokh wrote:
> Dears,
>
>
>
> I installed SipXecs version 4.2 using the ISO CD
> the installation process was really a breeze
> nice and easy.
> my test is local, so i don't need DN
You will need to ensure your SPI and/or ALG is off on your remote
firewall and that your firewall local to sipx is setup properly.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Nalbi Tahawokh wrote:
> Dears,
>
>
>
> I installed SipXecs version 4.2 using the ISO CD
> the installation process was really a breez
You need the SIP SRV records in the public DNS in order to register.
Hostname only gets you so far. SIP SRV records define more than just
the hostname. Please add them.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Nalbi Tahawokh wrote:
> Dears,
>
>
>
> I installed SipXecs version 4.2 using the ISO CD
> the
Dears,
I installed SipXecs version 4.2 using the ISO CD
the installation process was really a breeze
nice and easy.
my test is local, so i don't need DNS servers (although i have configured my
hostname on the company's DNS server).
and my PC is connected directly to the SipX server (back to ba
Tony Graziano wrote:
> Great question. I never got that answer either. I ended up deleting and
> recreating the line to get that accomplished. I call it throwing anvils at
> ants.
>
>
>
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: tg
29 matches
Mail list logo
