I've well build site-to-site calling between to standalone sipx servers.
I used suffix "55" to direct internal call from local endpoint to remote
endpoint of peer sipx site. In addition, I used suffix "9" to lead call to
local FXO gateway.
I am trying to use suffix "559" to lead call to remote F
Many thanks.
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Alfred Campbell wrote:
> On 6/6/2010 8:27 AM, Picher, Michael wrote:
>> Looks like there is a problem answer: 0
>>
>> > From iptools.com
>>
>> ;<<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1.1<<>> -t MX list.sipfoundry.org
>> ;; global options: printcmd
>> ;; Got answer:
>>
If 3.10 was working for you I'd setup a separate 3.10 system and route ACD
calls over to it.
I've stopped using ACD because of the problems with it and there is no work
being done on the current ACD. There is work being done to replace it.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-
On 6/6/2010 8:27 AM, Picher, Michael wrote:
> Looks like there is a problem answer: 0
>
> > From iptools.com
>
> ;<<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1.1<<>> -t MX list.sipfoundry.org
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4629
> ;; flags: qr rd ra;
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8504
Please vote for it if you think it has merit.
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Picher, Michael
wrote:
> Open another Jira on it... I think it's an entirely reasonable request.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.o
Open another Jira on it... I think it's an entirely reasonable request.
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
> Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 8:40 AM
> To: Sipx-users list
> Subject:
On 6/6/2010 8:08 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Little or no traffic on sipx-users and sipx-dev since Friday afternoon.
>
> list.sipfoundry.org does not have any publicly published MX records,
> though sipfoundry.org shows lists.sipfoundry.org.
>
> I am not having a problem posting, but another user co
On 6/6/2010 8:40 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> I see that a couple hundred issues were recently closed.
>
> I'd like to ask "again" as to the option to support file type other
> than WAV files for voicemail. Now that the Media Server is FS based,
> and FS has the ability to encode for other formats (m
I see that a couple hundred issues were recently closed.
I'd like to ask "again" as to the option to support file type other
than WAV files for voicemail. Now that the Media Server is FS based,
and FS has the ability to encode for other formats (mp3, etc.), I'd
like to re-open this discussion as t
Looks like there is a problem answer: 0
>From iptools.com
; <<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1.1 <<>> -t MX list.sipfoundry.org
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4629
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION
Little or no traffic on sipx-users and sipx-dev since Friday afternoon.
list.sipfoundry.org does not have any publicly published MX records,
though sipfoundry.org shows lists.sipfoundry.org.
I am not having a problem posting, but another user contacted me who
was having a problem.
Can someone he
11 matches
Mail list logo