[sipx-users] Call to FXO gateway of peer sipx server in site-to-site calling

2010-06-06 Thread Wen Jun
I've well build site-to-site calling between to standalone sipx servers. I used suffix "55" to direct internal call from local endpoint to remote endpoint of peer sipx site. In addition, I used suffix "9" to lead call to local FXO gateway. I am trying to use suffix "559" to lead call to remote F

Re: [sipx-users] MX records for list.sipfoundry.org do not resolve

2010-06-06 Thread Tony Graziano
Many thanks. On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Alfred Campbell wrote: > On 6/6/2010 8:27 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: >> Looks like there is a problem  answer: 0 >> >> > From iptools.com >> >> ;<<>>  DiG 9.3.4-P1.1<<>>  -t MX list.sipfoundry.org >> ;; global options: printcmd >> ;; Got answer: >>

Re: [sipx-users] ACD sign-in fails

2010-06-06 Thread Picher, Michael
If 3.10 was working for you I'd setup a separate 3.10 system and route ACD calls over to it. I've stopped using ACD because of the problems with it and there is no work being done on the current ACD. There is work being done to replace it. Mike > -Original Message- > From: sipx-users-

Re: [sipx-users] MX records for list.sipfoundry.org do not resolve

2010-06-06 Thread Alfred Campbell
On 6/6/2010 8:27 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: > Looks like there is a problem answer: 0 > > > From iptools.com > > ;<<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1.1<<>> -t MX list.sipfoundry.org > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4629 > ;; flags: qr rd ra;

Re: [sipx-users] Support Alternate file encodings for VM

2010-06-06 Thread Tony Graziano
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8504 Please vote for it if you think it has merit. On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: > Open another Jira on it...  I think it's an entirely reasonable request. > >> -Original Message- >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.o

Re: [sipx-users] Support Alternate file encodings for VM

2010-06-06 Thread Picher, Michael
Open another Jira on it... I think it's an entirely reasonable request. > -Original Message- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users- > boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano > Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 8:40 AM > To: Sipx-users list > Subject:

Re: [sipx-users] MX records for list.sipfoundry.org do not resolve

2010-06-06 Thread Alfred Campbell
On 6/6/2010 8:08 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Little or no traffic on sipx-users and sipx-dev since Friday afternoon. > > list.sipfoundry.org does not have any publicly published MX records, > though sipfoundry.org shows lists.sipfoundry.org. > > I am not having a problem posting, but another user co

Re: [sipx-users] Support Alternate file encodings for VM

2010-06-06 Thread Alfred Campbell
On 6/6/2010 8:40 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I see that a couple hundred issues were recently closed. > > I'd like to ask "again" as to the option to support file type other > than WAV files for voicemail. Now that the Media Server is FS based, > and FS has the ability to encode for other formats (m

[sipx-users] Support Alternate file encodings for VM

2010-06-06 Thread Tony Graziano
I see that a couple hundred issues were recently closed. I'd like to ask "again" as to the option to support file type other than WAV files for voicemail. Now that the Media Server is FS based, and FS has the ability to encode for other formats (mp3, etc.), I'd like to re-open this discussion as t

Re: [sipx-users] MX records for list.sipfoundry.org do not resolve

2010-06-06 Thread Picher, Michael
Looks like there is a problem answer: 0 >From iptools.com ; <<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1.1 <<>> -t MX list.sipfoundry.org ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4629 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION

[sipx-users] MX records for list.sipfoundry.org do not resolve

2010-06-06 Thread Tony Graziano
Little or no traffic on sipx-users and sipx-dev since Friday afternoon. list.sipfoundry.org does not have any publicly published MX records, though sipfoundry.org shows lists.sipfoundry.org. I am not having a problem posting, but another user contacted me who was having a problem. Can someone he