Broadvox
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of M. Ranganathan
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 4:41 PM
To: Nathan Nieblas
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] bandwidth.com problems
O
>>> "M. Ranganathan" 06/25/10 7:41 PM >>>
>>There is some port harmonization work ongoing which will allow
>>signaling to be sent to port 5060 (i.e. the ITSP can signal port 5060
>>for inbound signaling) but that work is not yet completed.
Is that tracker issue XX-5010? I was trying to track tha
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Nathan Nieblas
wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I finally got in touch with a live person who told
> me they were having gateway problems most of the day and it’s just been
> recently resolved. So on that note, can anyone recommend a bandwidth.com
> alternative ar
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Rawlings
Date: Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Exchange 2010 and MWI
To: Tony Graziano
well 3cx is a waste of my time.
other than that i am using a mix of Cisco SPA 525G and Polycom IP650/450
phones
Just wondering if MWI
Tell us how you really feel.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Chris Rawlings wrote:
> Does this work yet?
> I know in 3cx it does now in version 9 of 3cx and exchange 2010
>
> i know exchange 2007 implementation of MWI was shit and did not work
>
>
>
> --
> Thank You,
> Chris Rawlings
> IT Consul
The only auto failover you might see is if it fails to register, ala voip.ms
bandwidth.com gives you some failover which can be added (different ip
addresses as targets) but they had a main proxy issue, and that proxy had a
fiber link running through my backyard where the tornado liked it a lot...
Does this work yet?
I know in 3cx it does now in version 9 of 3cx and exchange 2010
i know exchange 2007 implementation of MWI was shit and did not work
--
Thank You,
Chris Rawlings
IT Consultant
phone - 610.741.3324
VCP RHCE RHCT MCSE
___
sipx-use
Thanks for the response. I finally got in touch with a live person who
told me they were having gateway problems most of the day and it's just
been recently resolved. So on that note, can anyone recommend a
bandwidth.com alternative around the same price point? Is AT&T pretty
solid? Do any of these
Definitely before 18944. I'll see if Doug Hubler has this on his roadmap
for the opensuse build.
On 06/25/2010 12:22 PM, JOLY, ROBERT (ROBERT) wrote:
> If call pickup to a hunt group ever worked then it would have been definitely
> broken by the commit in revision 18076. The bug introduced by 1
Andrew Sauder wrote these functions - I'm just passing them along. We are
using this on an in-house click to call website - this shows what happens if a
user is NOT already in sipXecs (the end user is on a legacy system).
As far as we can tell - to add a user - you must use SOAP - to add an
ex
If call pickup to a hunt group ever worked then it would have been definitely
broken by the commit in revision 18076. The bug introduced by 18076 got undone
in revision 18944 so presumably hunt group call pick up started working again
after that revision... What rev. Are you using?
bob
> ---
At the moment, caller id has been working again and being inundated with work,
we've not had the chance to get back to this problem and even more difficult if
it's going to be random. The logging problem lead us down the path of trying to
figure out that, so that we could log so that we could tr
Anyone know if there are some settings I can tweak to iron out echo (IP side)
on a patton PRI gateway? I've not had a lot of time to troubleshoot it - calls
to my cell phone are great - calls to a local number have echo (that number is
serviced out of the same CO - if that matters). From the s
Excuses, excuses
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 12:09 PM
To: wwie...@warrentek.com
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org; Nathan Nieblas
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] bandwidth.com proble
This has worked reliably until recently (not sure exactly when, no one
told me it wasn't working). I put all numbers that would be in a "pickup
group" into the hunt group, then dial *78 where is the hunt
group number to pickup a call on any one of the numbers in the hunt
group. Now it
no, its called a crap shoot. Never done it, never will unless it is
functional.
We use a unique line number on each phone in a hunt group (never use the
same) it will never work reliably. Doing a directed line pickup to a line in
the hunt group WIL work.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Picher,
its called a tornado
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Warren K. Wiemer wrote:
> Nathan,
>
>
>
> I have several clients that started experiencing issues with the services
> from Bandwidth.com around 10:00 AM EDT this morning, whereas callers where
> hearing a message stating that the number was n
You can call pickup to a hunt group?
That's actually a new one on me, but I have never tried it before
either.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
> boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Josh Patten
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 201
After transitioning a new deparment over to sipX this morning it came to
my attention that call pickup to hunt groups was no longer working (user
gets fast busy). Directed call pickup works fine. I have snapshots with
proxy and registrar logging set to INFO but they're too big for the list.
If
Nathan,
I have several clients that started experiencing issues with the services
from Bandwidth.com around 10:00 AM EDT this morning, whereas callers where
hearing a message stating that the number was no longer in service or had
been disconnected. The when trying to reach Bandwidth.com on the
Their phones of all things were down earlier this week. Not sure if they are
still having issues.
-Original Message-
From: "Nathan Nieblas"
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:43:55
To:
Subject: [sipx-users] bandwidth.com problems
_
Anyone having a problem with Bandwidth.com right now?
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PB
On 6/25/10 7:27 AM, an...@iguanait.com wrote:
Hi,
we are trying to get working sipxecs for users via vpn tunnel using
openvpn.
'multiple ip/network interfaces' will give you problems.
(openvpn creates a tun/ or tap interface)
your only hope is to BRIDGE using tap (not a good idea. bridge
Hey,
I recently configured sipx with an ITSP
For incoming /outgoing.
First, configured the gateway, then SBC / sipxbridge.
Then dialplan.
Then extension with the corresponding alias.
Incoming calls work perfectly, everything great.
But outgoing does not work.
The dialrule says
All number of dig
Hi,
we are trying to get working sipxecs for users via vpn tunnel using
openvpn.
I will try to explain our installation in this message and will try to
explain our problems we have.
A. Installation:
A.1. We have a server with Centos 5.5 x86_64 with 1 public ip address
and installed VirtualBox o
4.2 is the current release.
On 6/25/10, Richard Zhao wrote:
> Hi, anyone knows when it will be officially release? I am thinking to
> use it to try out some new features.
>
> Richard
> ___
> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> List
4.2 was officially released some time ago. It was reported on the
SipFoundry website on Friday, April 16th, 2010.
I'd say use it.
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Richard Zhao
Sent: Thursday, June
27 matches
Mail list logo
