Re: [sipx-users] Default system codes list?

2010-07-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 7/20/10 5:15 PM, Jim Canfield wrote: > The recent post asking about mailbox forward brought to mind a > question I've had for some time now. Does a list of default system > codes exist in a centralized location? On several occasion I've found > myself hunting through help menus to find simple f

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Calls Routing Incorrectly

2010-07-23 Thread Tony Graziano
If it is listed it means media relay will not be used. It also means the two networks can route directly to each other without nat. Is this correct? Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Secu

[sipx-users] Never get 180 Ringing

2010-07-23 Thread Sven Evensen
We are engaged with a large mobile operator and are using there own SIP trunk infrastructure, a CS2K (with ISUP interface to the PSTN) and ACME packet. The problem is that their SIP trunk is configured to give 183 with SDP immediately upon receiving the outgoing INVITE. After that it is opened fo

[sipx-users] Inbound Calls Routing Incorrectly

2010-07-23 Thread Talbot, Peter
Currently inbound calls are coming in from our ITSP, hitting our sipbridge, but then from the bridge they are not routing to our core server . The exact 'problem' Invite is shown below: Time: 2010-07-23T20:09:21.080716Z Frame: 90 /tmp/trace.EOm21552/_.sipXproxy.trace.xml:6838 /tmp/trace.EOm215

Re: [sipx-users] Job failure doing restart of phones after sendprofiles

2010-07-23 Thread McIlvin, Don
Oh forgot to mention, the phones are registering fine, and when I force a phone to restart it pulls the new config created in sipxconfig or new sip or bootrom just fine. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of McIlvin, Don Sent:

Re: [sipx-users] Job failure doing restart of phones after send profiles

2010-07-23 Thread McIlvin, Don
Phones are on the same LAN as the SipXecs servers (4.2) {w/services on 4 boxes}. We have a primary server w/{proxy, registrar, and the other services}, two SipXbridge/SBC servers running SIP Trunk service as well as a separate sipX HA). DHCP and DNS is a separate server. No remote phones, or VPN.

[sipx-users] ip registration but still need to autenticate?

2010-07-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
if using ip registration (ie: no registration) with level3/broadsoft, they still want me to send a valid (one of their) DID's in each and every outbound call. for 'authentication' (authentication,not registration) sipx seems to put our ip address in, despite having cleared 'p-asserted identit

Re: [sipx-users] architecture question

2010-07-23 Thread Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
from http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Broadsoft "Broadsoft develops and sells carrier grade VOIP software solutions to major ISPs, phone companies, cable companies, and wireless operators. If measured by numbers of users, Broadsoft is likely the largest VOIP application provider in the world

Re: [sipx-users] architecture question

2010-07-23 Thread Tony Graziano
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 7/23/10 9:22 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Michael Scheidell > wrote: > >> Mostly for those who know sipx and might be using a separate sbc. >> (for broadsoft customers, this might life easier t

Re: [sipx-users] architecture question

2010-07-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 7/23/10 9:22 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Michael Scheidell mailto:scheid...@secnap.net>> wrote: Mostly for those who know sipx and might be using a separate sbc. (for broadsoft customers, this might life easier to explain to them, and for those

Re: [sipx-users] architecture question

2010-07-23 Thread Tony Graziano
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Mostly for those who know sipx and might be using a separate sbc. > (for broadsoft customers, this might life easier to explain to them, and > for those who insist their firewall can do sip translations, this is why it > can't) > > Broad

[sipx-users] architecture question

2010-07-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
Mostly for those who know sipx and might be using a separate sbc. (for broadsoft customers, this might life easier to explain to them, and for those who insist their firewall can do sip translations, this is why it can't) If I had a separate SBC, rather than sipxbridge, it would run on a sepe