you must be using a mac, always crashes on my windoze boxes.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Jim Canfield wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Gerald Drouillard
> wrote:
> > http://icanblink.com/index.phtml
> >
>
> Very nice looking. Can't wait to try it out.
> __
And if you manually did the config and are sending to the proxy via ip
address, well, it will only work if it is reolving via ip...
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Chris St Denis
wrote:
> My DNS records are setup as what the DNS Advisor provided, and a dig -t SRV
> _sip._udp.2ic.ca appears to give correct values
>
> _sip._udp.2ic.ca. 10800 IN SRV 1 0 5060 pbx2.2ic.ca.
> _sip._udp.2ic.ca. 10800 IN
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Gerald Drouillard
wrote:
> http://icanblink.com/index.phtml
>
Very nice looking. Can't wait to try it out.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx
I have a new install of SipxPBX 4.2.1 which I've setup as a high
availability cluster (both installed from CD image method).
Our PSTN gateway is an AudioCodes Mediant 1000 (not managed by sipx) and
the incoming number I am testing with is routed to dest IP address
"2ic.ca" which is the domain
http://icanblink.com/index.phtml
Cross platform, open source.
Even has Google contact sync.
Worked on first try.
--
Regards
--
Gerald Drouillard
Technology Architect
Drouillard & Associates, Inc.
http://www.Drouillard.biz
What? Really?
That would be spectacular.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Picher
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 2:16 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 3.1.3c,
btw... a little birdie told me earlier today there actually might be a
3.2.4 released around the second week of December...
specifically to address the registration problems with 3.2.3.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Tony Graziano <
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:
> I have always been o
I have always been of the mind that "essentially" all of the config should
be there, only some should be placed under advanced so it can be fully
leveraged.
Beware -- 3.3 is a huge job though. Even with a team, it will take some time
to get done. SLA will have to be tested. Phones can be send chan
On 11/17/2010 11:05 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> It's a really big job. There are a lot of changes not just the the
> config file, but also to sipxconfig.
>
> There are also new features (like pinlocking the phone).
>
> I had suggested a irc or conference call after 4.4 is released to see if
> there
I think somebody's going to have to document the differences as a start...
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Philippe Laurent wrote:
> Anybody besides me willing to contribute to a fund to get this done sooner
> than later (based on the assumption that SLA works in 3.3). Rebooting phones
> every
It's a really big job. There are a lot of changes not just the the config
file, but also to sipxconfig.
There are also new features (like pinlocking the phone).
I had suggested a irc or conference call after 4.4 is released to see if
there is a way we could break up the config into "parts" and le
Anybody besides me willing to contribute to a fund to get this done sooner
than later (based on the assumption that SLA works in 3.3). Rebooting phones
every two days off-hours to keep SLA working is getting way old...
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Gerald Drouillard
wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 8:34
On 11/16/2010 8:34 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Reality is 3.2 has issues. 3.2.2 sla does not work. 3.2.3 doesn't allow one
> to pickup the phone.
>
> What all that is supposedly resolved in 3.3, 3.3 requires a complete rewrite
> in sipxconfig because a lot of fields, values and parameters change.
Do
Matthew, I've been having some success with 3.2.1b firmware.
Mike
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Reality is 3.2 has issues. 3.2.2 sla does not work. 3.2.3 doesn't allow one
> to pickup the phone.
>
> What all that is supposedly resolved in 3.3, 3.3 requires a complete
>
Most folks just manually configure them. How many do you have?
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Brandon wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> Was wondering if anyone would be interested in adding support for the
> Aastra 9133i so that it can be auto-provisioned. I would be glad to donate
> as a contribution...
No there is not any kind of confirmation mode.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Mark Little wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am currently building a replacement for an ageing proprietary PBX
> system for a client, and I have duplicated almost everything except I
> have hit a road block and would appr
Small form factor is here:
http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/c-2-globalscale-technologies-products.aspx
Paul
Jesse Reynolds Wrote:
>
> > (Me thinks a stuck "state" in your firewall would explain this type of
> > behavior)
>
>
> Right. Makes sense. This is the linux based firewall sub
I'm using Kirk WS6000 and I'm quite satisfied: it's simple to configure,
very good audi oquality and radio coverage.and
But as I wrote in a previous mail, it has an issue about call transfer.
Massimo
--
Massimo Vignone
UniMORE - Servizi Informatici - Reti e Sistemi
Phone: +39.059.2058032 Fa
19 matches
Mail list logo
