Been searching all day, trying different things, nothing seems to lead to an
answer.
It sounded like it might be an SSL/Certificate issue at one point but not only
do I only see port 389 connections going out of sipx but I also installed a
cert on the AD server which made no difference.
I've
Please disregard this post. It's a copy of the reply I was editing before I
sent it. My mailer held it for some reason and when I fired it back up, sent it
out.
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:07:49 -0600, m...@grounded.net wrote:
>> But that's a misleading thought, because one phone can use multiple
>
> But that's a misleading thought, because one phone can use multiple
> connections depending on what features,
>functions, etc. it has. On a call, new call comes in, etc.
Sorry, I thought I qualified that by saying if he knows where the connections
are coming from.
But yeah, that's a good poin
On the windows 2003 server logs, I see;
***
Windows cannot access the file gpt.ini for GPO
CN={31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=pdc,DC=mydomain,DC=com.
The file must be present at the location
<\\pdc.mydomain.com\sysvol\pdc.mydomain.com\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11
I'm reminded of why I like forums again, can't edit :).
Forgot to add that I've tried changing the port to 636 and running the test
based on
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-3505
# tail -f /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxconfig.log
"2010-12-28T22:39:39.374000Z":202:JAVA:WARNING:sx232.mydomain.com:P
Hmm, now I'm looking at:
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/LDAP+Integration
and the screens are different than my 4.2.1-018971.dhubler 2010-08-21T04:59:23
build37 version.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archiv
I'm following the following doc:
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Integration+with+Microsoft+Active+Directory+and+Exchange+2007
I get the 'Failed connection to LDAP server: Operation failed' and cannot get
past the initial configuration screen.
In the server screen, I have entered both
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <55519>
Message-ID:
the sipx iso is a centos installer. so the real question
here is "what does centos not like about your hardware
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <55518>
Message-ID:
No.
I suppose you could write your own script to parse the
missed calls by querying the CDR database and fire
Have a look at:
http://malphx.free.fr/dotclear/index.php?post/2010/08/17/Playing-with-SIP-NMAP-and-NSE
Needs nmap 5.0 or greater: http://nmap.org/download.html
Works with/without sipxecs running. No need to stop it.
Starting Nmap 5.21 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2010-12-28 08:27 EST
N
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <55515>
Message-ID:
sipXecs does this vias instant messenger, which is much
faster and provides a few more options than email does.
> But that's a misleading thought, because one phone can use multiple
> connections depending on what features, functions, etc. it has. On a
> call, new call comes in, etc.
>
> I don't know of a way to "properly" limit legitimate traffic and not
> constantly be micromanaging that. If the user has
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:35 AM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
>> To prevent fraud,is it possible to configure how many
>> simultaneous phones that may be registered against a
>> number?
>
> One way could be to limit the number of connections by IP if you have that
> information for certain remotes.
>
> To prevent fraud,is it possible to configure how many
> simultaneous phones that may be registered against a
> number?
One way could be to limit the number of connections by IP if you have that
information for certain remotes.
You could do this through your firewall but I thought I read somewh
The owner of sipx installation directory is a user other than sipxchange, it
is the user that makes the build process, but everyone has the rights to
read/write (777) - does it matter?
Eda
2010/12/28 Matt White
> >>> Eda Ercan 12/28/10 3:08 AM >>>
>
> >>>Can you provide the path for the CDR d
>>> Eda Ercan 12/28/10 3:08 AM >>>
>>>Can you provide the path for the CDR directory? Is it under the sipx
>>>installation directory?>>>
>>>
>>>CDR db exists.?
>>>
>>>Eda
/var/sipxdata/reports
But i'd check the permissions on all the folders under /var/sipxdata. Every
now and then when we b
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Niklas wrote:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Organization: SipXecs Forum
> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <55504>
> Message-ID:
>
>
>
> Hi,
> Have a user who wants to have 9 phones connected to th
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <55504>
Message-ID:
Hi,
Have a user who wants to have 9 phones connected to the same
number. Is there a problem with that?
Another question:
To
Can you provide the path for the CDR directory? Is it under the sipx
installation directory?
CDR db exists.
Eda
2010/12/27 Matt White
> have you checked permissions on the CDR directory? sipxchange must have
> rights to read/write.
>
> >>> Eda Ercan 12/27/10 11:18 AM >>>
>
> Hi,?
>
> In the
19 matches
Mail list logo
