Max, here is my way to configure.
1. In file /etc/sipxpbx/linksys/ata.xml change spa$MA → spa$MA*U*
2. In sipxecs GUI configure device using Linksys Ata2102
3. In PAP2T web 'Provisioning' tab change 'Profile role:' to /spa$MAU.cfg
4. reboot PAP2T
2011/8/5 Max DiOrio
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm tota
why exactly is this discussion on-list?
other than a very brief discussion of ham gateway capabilities, it is really
not list-worthy.
On Aug 7, 2011 6:46 PM, "m...@grounded.net" wrote:
> I certainly appreciate the offer.
>
> I'm not sure what we'll do yet, it's a little out of our league. It soun
fwiw-i think he's got it all working now.
On Aug 7, 2011 5:28 PM, "Michael Picher" wrote:
> I think I said that already...
> On Aug 7, 2011 12:58 PM, "Robin Gill" wrote:
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="utf-8"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>> Organization: SipXecs Forum
>> In-Repl
I certainly appreciate the offer.
I'm not sure what we'll do yet, it's a little out of our league. It sounds like
something we could do but it also sounds like there would be a learning curve
which would prevent us from giving proper estimates. To top it all off, we're
already over taxed on ot
I think I said that already...
On Aug 7, 2011 12:58 PM, "Robin Gill" wrote:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Organization: SipXecs Forum
> In-Reply-To:
> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <62129>
> Message-ID:
>
>
>
> I'm wondering if
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <62129>
Message-ID:
I'm wondering if the 10.32.0.65 address is the problem - in
pfsense on the options page for the wan interface,
meaning the proxy needs a response code like busy to force it to use a
secondary gateway. siptrinks in sipxbridge don't do this as far as I recall.
there'd are some cdr improvements being made but none that I know that
involved adding the gateway. one mentions the dialplan being recorded.
realize
the current gateway method doesn't really failover that way.
On Aug 7, 2011 10:05 AM, "Nathaniel Watkins"
wrote:
> Are there any plans (or is there a way to tell) what path a call is using.
i.e. for a long distance call, we use voip.ms, we use our Verizon PRI as a
backup - currently, I can't (or d
Are there any plans (or is there a way to tell) what path a call is using.
i.e. for a long distance call, we use voip.ms, we use our Verizon PRI as a
backup - currently, I can't (or don't know how) to tell what gateway a call
went out.
* For bill back purposes - do we charge them 1.25
Right. They don't have 1 of the hard buttons and the policy forces you to have
all of the ones in the group to remove any of them from the soft keys.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 09:24:26
To: ; Discussion list for users of sipXecs
software
Subject: Re: [
i dont have a 450 here to test with. but it really means the difference in
screen real estate. ive said enough.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) <
mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not on 450s :(
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Graziano
> Sender: sipx-u
Not on 450s :(
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 08:51:27
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs
software
Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Bounty - Single
Yes. I tested that and it does work. One button park/unpark with efk.
monitor with blf only.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> after reviewing the current efk functionality, I don't think its impossible
> to park/unpark a single park using a single push EFK key that appears d
after reviewing the current efk functionality, I don't think its impossible
to park/unpark a single park using a single push EFK key that appears during
an active call. I think you can also do the same thing with an EFK to do the
pickup from both an idle screen as an EFK.
I would not recommend usi
Correct. They do not have a method to do this in the FS code. It would need
to be enabled/functional at the FS level in order to monitor it.
So,
1. Make parks monitorable
2. switch sipxconfig to use call park on FS media server and to configure it
3. integrate to rls for blf
I would suggest anyo
I think Tony meant "has not made their park system monitorable yet"...
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> and realize the fs project has. it made their park system monitorable yet.
> that means the code needs to be committed and donated to fs too.
>
> On Aug 6, 2011 7:38 PM, "
16 matches
Mail list logo
