If you are only using sipXportLib and not the other libraries like
sipXtackLib and sipXcommServerLib then you can simply go to
src/Makefile.am and remove xmlparser/tiny*. The the same in
inlcude/Makefile.am. You can then issue `autoreconf -if;
./configure;make` on the sipXportLib folder and r
I'm running into an issue with tinyxml being defined in two imports into my
project. Is there an easy way to disable tinyxml support from sipXportLib?
Thanks,
Eric
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.s
> the TLD. However, it does take some Desktop-fu to get working.
Any chance you've come across anything that gives some example/s on how to use
it with sipx or that desktop-fu :)
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive:
Josh:
Thanks for the quick reply.
I have opened a feature request at http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9814 .
I'd contribute a patch for the feature, but I'm certain my java skills aren't
quite up to the task. Java is not my best attribute.
Regards,
Robert
On Aug 22, 2011, at 2:
Well you can have a phone in multiple groups.
The group closest to the bottom of the list has the highest precedence.
Mike
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Chris Rawlings wrote:
> i was thinking of something on that line... something where you have a
> similar to phone groups ... and then you
This is not currently a feature of sipXecs. This really is a multi tenant
feature.
In order to implement this you'd need to dig into the IVR java code and add
some functionality to restrict the auto attendant to certain groups of
extensions, and also add an option in the auto attendant configurati
Actually, it was a complete dump and replace. The only part of our VoIP system
that remains is the wiring and the PoE switch. Server and phones are all new.
[cid:image001.jpg@01CC60DB.81A1A320]
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For those of you using softphone, Oliver with the Service Desk found
this great add-on which enables dialing phone numbers from a web page.
There are some neat features, such as identifying the country code from
the TLD. However, it does take some Desk
I'm working on building a few new Auto Attendants, but I have a requirement
that I am unsure how to build out on sipXecs (4.4). I need to be able to
restrict the AA to allow the caller to enter only a subset of extensions.
For example, we have extensions 200-220 is "Administration", 221-240 is
regarding relit MWI, would your old asterisk server still happen to be on?
If so it could be magically sending out unsolicited MWI. Or if you didn't do
a hard reset on your polycom phones there could be some remnant asterisk
config in there.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Matt White wrote:
> >>
>>> On 8/22/2011 at 01:52 PM, in message
<94db29d614768e49b68e95b929bcafd0036ca...@earwax1.uent.com>, Max
DiOrio
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So far we've been using sipXecs in our office and it's been much
better than
> any Asterisk server I've put in.
>
> Our users are complaining about two things:
>
>
Hi,
So far we've been using sipXecs in our office and it's been much better than
any Asterisk server I've put in.
Our users are complaining about two things:
1) When a call comes in on an ACD queue and one of the agents goes to
answer it, there appears to be around a ½ second delay from
I've found that with Exchange SP1 a consultative transfer to any user
that goes to voicemail will drop if the transfer was competed before
exchange answers, but works if the transfer is completed after
Exchange picks up. Blind transfers seem to just work,
Kyle
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Ch
me either. I think the way to do this perhaps is with an api 4 specific imap
implementations like the ones you mentioned.
On Aug 22, 2011 9:58 AM, "Josh Patten" wrote:
> I lol'd...stupid autocorrect!
>
> In any case I'm pretty sure MS removed the SEARCHES capability. So unless
> someone gets in an
I lol'd...stupid autocorrect!
In any case I'm pretty sure MS removed the SEARCHES capability. So unless
someone gets in and figures out a way to interop with super watered down
IMAP servers like the ones included with gmail, Novell Groupwise, and MS
Exchange I don't ever see this working again.
O
exchange
On Aug 22, 2011 9:12 AM, "Chris Rawlings" wrote:
> what is a ex hangs config ?
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Tony Graziano <
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>> wrote:
>
>> if the imap server does not list "SEARCHES" in its capabilities it will
>> never work.
>>
>> telnet to the imap s
what is a ex hangs config ?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> if the imap server does not list "SEARCHES" in its capabilities it will
> never work.
>
> telnet to the imap server and see what it advertises. look at the ex hangs
> config and see if the function is available b
if the imap server does not list "SEARCHES" in its capabilities it will
never work.
telnet to the imap server and see what it advertises. look at the ex hangs
config and see if the function is available but not turned on.
not all imap servers can do SEARCHES.
On Aug 22, 2011 9:05 AM, "Chris Rawli
yeah i have the issue with Exchange 2010 SP1 also.. ijust setup another
Exchange 2010 box non sp1 with only UM roles... then pointed SipX to that.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Josh Patten wrote:
> Microsoft has been doing strange things to their interop with exchange 2010
> on all fronts lat
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <62786>
Message-ID:
I think you are better served to use at least 8gb of ram for
essentially any system running 4.4 these days unle
20 matches
Mail list logo
