I am getting the following error in freeswitch.log. I am sure if this is
a problem.
2011-09-07 14:47:45.563447 [CRIT] switch_loadable_module.c:928 Error Loading
module /etc/karoo.conf.d/config/.siptrunk/mod/mod_file_string.so
**/etc/karoo.conf.d/config/.siptrunk/mod/mod_file_string.so: cannot ope
You live...you learn.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
> I guess next time you'll have your ammunition and just say 'no, there isn't
> anything better that works as well...'
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Gary Luca wrote:
>>
>> You are preaching to the choir my friend.
We knew that :-)
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Mike Graham wrote:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="utf-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Organization: SipXecs Forum
> In-Reply-To:
> X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <63171>
> Message-ID:
>
>
>
> Just to update - the u
I guess next time you'll have your ammunition and just say 'no, there isn't
anything better that works as well...'
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Gary Luca wrote:
> You are preaching to the choir my friend.
>
> I proposed Polycom phones. They wanted a cheaper alternative ("What
> about Cisco p
Cyril,
Try manually configuring Bria... Add an account for SIP and a separate
account for XMPP.
I dont' tend to use Bria's XMPP functionality as there are better products
out there (like Spark & Pidgin). I do like in 3.2.1 that they now support
RLS!
Mike
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Tony G
You are preaching to the choir my friend.
I proposed Polycom phones. They wanted a cheaper alternative ("What
about Cisco phones?")
So I proposed these pieces of crap. They were cheaper.
I was told to go with the more "cost appropriate" option. So here I ambald.
But anyway...Tony is chec
Cheaper != better...
product selection is key to keeping yourself sane and your users happy.
You'be probably eaten up in your labor hours any $$ savings.
Of course that doesn't help you at the moment. Nor can I other than to
suggest you should perform a trace and post that in case some other pe
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <63171>
Message-ID:
Just to update - the upgrade to 4.4 has greatly improved
presence performance. Thanks.
___
Thanks all for your comments.
On Sep 8, 2011 1:12 PM, "Geoff Van Brunt" wrote:
> I have a Mediant 1000 PRI, several MP-11x's and a Patton FXO gateway. I
like them both. The Mediants are easier to setup from a browser, but their
CLI is next to useless. Patton is the other way around. That is the on
I can only assume your PC dns lookups are strange or counterpath started
silently supporting SRV records. I really lean towards DNS!
I stopped working with counterpath at 3.0. I can say the phone 'works and
provisions properly in 4.4 with the 3.0 version of bria, i just couldnt
make sense to keep
All,
I figured this out. I have two phone groups one to group phones by
model, one to group phones by department. If the alertInfo in the sip
section on both groups is not set to the default settings for
external and internal calls then the alertInfo for the intercom
settings is never added to
3.2.1 the latest
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:20:49
To:
Cc: Sipx-users Discussion List for users of sipXecs
software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1
what is the exact bria version you are running?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5
Couple of days ago I had someone trying to make international calls to
Israel. I tracked the source IP address. Registered to an Internet
provider in Palestine.
After that, I closed up port 5060 on the firewall. I don't need it right
now since I don't have remote workers and all ITSP calls goes
what is the exact bria version you are running?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:11 PM, wrote:
> ** My config is generated by sipx when I'm using provisioning
> functionnality.
>
> --
> *From: * Tony Graziano
> *Date: *Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:41:48 -0400
> *To: *; Discussion list
My config is generated by sipx when I'm using provisioning functionnality.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:41:48
To: ; Discussion list for users of sipXecs
software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Instant Message group - Bria 3.2.1
I'm familiar with some of t
Hello all,
Don't know if anyone has encountered this issue yet. I've been
searching high and low all day and driving myself crazy trying to
figure out why my brand new Cisco SPA504G and SPA502G phones are able
to make outbound calls with no problem but absolutely will not receive
inbound calls.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> I have had no issues with it since installing it as soon as it was
> published.
thanks tony.
I'm going to add one more fix to update #10
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9848
I should still get this out tonight.
_
I'm familiar with some of the bria idiosyncrasies, but not as up to date on
them since i decided their product was not something that was worth my
effort at this time. i spend more time and money with every release they
make trying to figure out what broke, it became pointless to pursue and use
the
I have had no issues with it since installing it as soon as it was
published.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:39 PM, cyril constantin <
cyril.constan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Updated, Tested, Working, many thanks for your update, good job.
>
> Best Regards.
>
> Cyril
>
>
> 2011/8/18 Douglas Hubler
>
>>
i have not looked at my config files. i will verify that my intercom works
on 4.4.
During a 4.2 to 4.4 upgrade you should see new profiles projected and the
phones restart.
If you "touched" any of the config files manually or the templates, there
might be a permissions issue that perhaps did not
I have two installations running on 4.4 with patches that are using the
successfully using the Intercom feature. One with Polycom, one with Linksys
SP942 phones.
No customization has been done to software other than a dropped in java file
for sipxconfig.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfo
I will check this and get back to you today. will you verify what patch
level you are on?
On Sep 8, 2011 1:09 PM, "Kyle Haefner" wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is unique to me or not, but with the upgrade from
> 4.2 to 4.4 intercom seems to be broken. I add the phone group to the
> intercom setting
I have a Mediant 1000 PRI, several MP-11x's and a Patton FXO gateway. I like
them both. The Mediants are easier to setup from a browser, but their CLI is
next to useless. Patton is the other way around. That is the only major
difference I could find.
Geoff Van Brunt
IT Manager
Thunder Bay
I'm not sure if this is unique to me or not, but with the upgrade from
4.2 to 4.4 intercom seems to be broken. I add the phone group to the
intercom settings, generate the profiles, but nothing is filled in for
the alertInfo section on the phone config.
Any one else seeing this?
Kyle
--
I still think the Exchange web service API is the most reliable going
forward. It is designed for manipulating messages etc in a users store.
MS is usually pretty good about not breaking their published API's.
Can't say the same about SIP or MAPI though. Those have been broken many
times in the pas
Hi Tony,
The hostname is already created as an alias on the domain menu of sipxecs, it
has been done automatically when I have upgraded sipxecs in the past to #update
9.
So why it works when I change into Bria ps0sipx01.webcti.local to webcti.local
if they don't support XMPP SRV ?
It looks th
A couple of things to note:
The hostname and sipdomain on your install are better left as unique (not
the same). If that is true, the provisioning for bria will use the hostname?
Why? Because the folks at Counterpath do not support SRV for XMPP, only for
SIP. I fought them over it and stopped talk
well i tryed my extension another extension and an extension with no phone
associated... all send the call directly to the Exchange UM Voicemail system
like i said if i turn exchange um voicemail option off it will work just
fine for faxes... i am thinking of stopping the use of Exchange UM or
set
Hi Guys,
I have observed that provisioning for Bria is sending the XMPP Account
detail with hostname of the primary server, so in my case it looks like
below into Bria 3.2:
Domain: ps0sipx01.webcti.local
But Sipxecs is sending provisioning contact like below:
I don't have the possibility to se
The new "fax" user has internal voicemail server chosen, correct?
In this case, the fax DID goes to what device first to get routed?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Chris Rawlings wrote:
> well i tryed my extension another extension and an extension with no phone
> associated... all send the ca
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: SipXecs Forum
In-Reply-To:
X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 <63143>
Message-ID:
I have three Mediant 1000 PRI gateways and a number of
MP-11x analog gateways and all have been rock solid. I
You are entitled to your opinion.
In the meantime, be a little creative and setup a separate account for
yourself in sipx and in the unified messaging put in your fax extension and
did stuff on your secondary account.
If the DID number passes directly from the gateway to sipxivr it will work.
The
if i have my voicemail dialplan set to an exchange server for unified
messaging built into exchange server... and then i have an extension & DID
set for a users UM profile on SipXecs it just forwards me to the exchange
voicemail server login when i dial that DID associated to the users FAX
number..
kind of late to diagnose. very bothersome to troubleshoot 4.2.anything.
you are asking something that you already have an answer to:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8063
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Jan Fricke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after a reboot everything works fine again. The problem
Hi,
after a reboot everything works fine again. The problem is more complex than
it seemed on the first look. Let me explain it:
The hole telephony was down. The system ran for several month without any
problem. It was reachable by ssh and http.
sipxproc on console showed all services running.
Yeah, Karoo Bridge will drop unsolicited notifies. but used properly in
a subscription to eventList (RLS), Karoo should be able to handle it
without a glitch.
On 09/08/2011 08:26 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
My apologies. As it turns out, by mistake, I added presense of my own
extension to the r
My apologies. As it turns out, by mistake, I added presense of my own
extension to the remote worker ua. As a result, it appears that this
created a confusion between in the karoo bridge.
Thanks,
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> It seam that the cause are NOTIFY messages
I uploaded builds for CentOS 6, but only for development binaries :
0.0.4.5.2. If all tests out ok and I can backport FS fixes to sipxecs
4.4 to support CentOS 6, then sipxecs 4.4 binaries can be built. I
have no idea about CentOS 6 as an ISO at this point.
__
I think this has been discussed before. RLS has a performance issue in
larger installations especially with XMPP roles enabled. In your case
updating to 4.4 would help to eliminate a lot of the RLS issues, but in the
meantime have you attempted a reboot?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Michael Pic
Jan,
I'd move to 4.4.0 to pick up large improvements to RLS.
Thanks,
Mike
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Jan Fricke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since yesterday we have a problem with the resourcelistserver of a sipx
> 4.2.1 installation. Our system monitoring threw an alert CPU 100% Load > 70.
>
> /va
40 matches
Mail list logo
