[sipx-users] Polycom Support for 3.3 + and VVX500 and other next gen phones

2012-01-09 Thread Todd Hodgen
Developers - There needs to be a broad discussion about support for Polycom version 3.3 and beyond, as well as support for the next generation phones they have or are releasing in 2012. The first phone - the VVX500 is out now, and not supported within sipXecs. This email is not to start the

Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs on vmware?

2012-01-09 Thread Niek Vlessert
Well, My 2 cents are that the most important thing is the settings. If you are able to implement QOS all over the place (storage, virtual networking, virtual servers, VM clock stuff, sipXecs, phone, media gateway) the load should not matter and then you don't have to seperate the media. Anyone

Re: [sipx-users] Call Forwarding ..

2012-01-09 Thread Niek Vlessert
Disable permission on all outgoing calls. Op 7 jan. 2012, om 15:11 heeft S.K.- G het volgende geschreven: Dear All, We are experiencing a weird problem with the Trunk to trunk call forwarding feature. The call forwarding is not working when an outside caller gets forwarded to another

Re: [sipx-users] Call Forwarding ..

2012-01-09 Thread Niek Vlessert
Excuse me, too little too late. :) Op 7 jan. 2012, om 15:11 heeft S.K.- G het volgende geschreven: Dear All, We are experiencing a weird problem with the Trunk to trunk call forwarding feature. The call forwarding is not working when an outside caller gets forwarded to another

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Support for 3.3 + and VVX500 and other next gen phones

2012-01-09 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Todd Hodgen thod...@frontier.com wrote: Developers – There needs to be a broad discussion about support for Polycom version 3.3 and beyond, as well as support for the next generation phones they have or are releasing in 2012.  The first phone – the VVX500 is out

[sipx-users] Cutsheet.csv

2012-01-09 Thread Aaron Pursell
Anyone have a copy of the sample csv? The link is broken on both spots at: http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Import+User+and+Device+Data+from+CSV+Files Much appreciated! Regards, Aaron Aaron Pursell Network Systems Administration Easter Seals-Goodwill Northern Rocky Mountain,

Re: [sipx-users] Cutsheet.csv

2012-01-09 Thread Michael Picher
Why don't you just do an export? Hint... you'll get a blank file or you'll get a file with whatever you have in your system... On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Aaron Pursell aar...@esgw.org wrote: Anyone have a copy of the sample csv? The link is broken on both spots at:

Re: [sipx-users] Cutsheet.csv

2012-01-09 Thread Tony Graziano
If you have access to a working system you can do an export which gives you a working sample. On Jan 9, 2012 10:26 AM, Aaron Pursell aar...@esgw.org wrote: Anyone have a copy of the sample csv? The link is broken on both spots at:

Re: [sipx-users] Cutsheet.csv

2012-01-09 Thread Aaron Pursell
Just wasn't sure if the sample was any different as far as voicemail passwords. Already exported one just wanted to see a sample. Aaron Pursell Network Systems Administration Easter Seals-Goodwill Northern Rocky Mountain, Inc. 4400 Central Ave Great Falls, Montana 59405 (406) 771-3721

Re: [sipx-users] Cutsheet.csv

2012-01-09 Thread Michael Picher
the PIN's are exported as encrypted. to import new pins, just set them as you want them and the system will take an encrypt them. the other thing i do is usually create a couple users with the types of phones i'll want to use so that i can get the phone template names i need. On Mon, Jan 9,

Re: [sipx-users] Cutsheet.csv

2012-01-09 Thread Tony Graziano
If you import from scratch the vm pin would be a simple value (ex: 1234), upon import they are encrypted with the sip domain part. On Jan 9, 2012 10:31 AM, Aaron Pursell aar...@esgw.org wrote: Just wasn't sure if the sample was any different as far as voicemail passwords. Already exported one

Re: [sipx-users] Call Forwarding ..

2012-01-09 Thread Saad
Hello Niek, Thank you for the hint, I have all permissions greyed out and I'm not able to change permissions ... Not able to place outbound calls .. But PSTN to PSTN call forwarding works .. Please help Cheers Saad On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Niek Vlessert niekvless...@gmail.comwrote:

[sipx-users] January 2012 SIPfoundry Newsletter

2012-01-09 Thread Jo Ann Stadtmueller
[image: SIPfoundry]http://us2.campaign-archive2.com/?u=794d90b06dd944e3e04dc2d9cid=82c6fcd6a1e=36ab517cc8 HELLO Welcome to the SIPfoundry Insider- your source for open communications and social business. Each issue we will feature the latest community news, articles and updates on SIPfoundry to

Re: [sipx-users] forums...

2012-01-09 Thread Saad
Hello Michael, The PSTN to PSTN call forwarding has worked properly; however, the simple outbound calling seems to be affected as the call gets times out after we changed SIPX Gateway to UNMANAGED.. Any hints please Cheers Saad On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com

Re: [sipx-users] forums...

2012-01-09 Thread Michael Picher
Gave you all the hints I could... The big hint i gave you was: Make sure you terminate your trunks in your SBC and make sure that the SBC is setup as an unmanaged gateway in sipXecs. If you get your trunks setup properly there and your NAT traversal for remote users setup properly there your

Re: [sipx-users] forums...

2012-01-09 Thread Saad
Alright, Thank you very much .. I will review every thing from the beginning .. Have a good one Saad On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com wrote: Gave you all the hints I could... The big hint i gave you was: Make sure you terminate your trunks in your SBC and

Re: [sipx-users] forums...

2012-01-09 Thread Tony Graziano
(as I stated last week, sipx is still anchoring media for remote users, it should be handled in the sbc) On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com wrote: Gave you all the hints I could... The big hint i gave you was: Make sure you terminate your trunks in your SBC and

Re: [sipx-users] forums...

2012-01-09 Thread Michael Picher
exactly... the purpose of a SBC is to remove this burden of terminating trunks and managing NAT from the server. On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote: (as I stated last week, sipx is still anchoring media for remote users, it should be handled in

Re: [sipx-users] forums...

2012-01-09 Thread Tony Graziano
When using an SBC the server behind Nat and remote users would be unchecked. The DNS srv records would point to the sub not sipx. The phones registrations would pass thru the sbc . On Jan 9, 2012 11:36 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com wrote: exactly... the purpose of a SBC is to remove