Re: [sipx-users] All phone registrations expiring

2012-02-11 Thread Tony Graziano
Further, because of the way java consumes ram and any upgrade process (reboot after an upgrade and the system projects all profiles), this is the working load a system starts with hand there needs to be enough ram to use accordingly. On Feb 11, 2012 6:56 PM, "Todd Hodgen" wrote: > I don’t want to

Re: [sipx-users] All phone registrations expiring

2012-02-11 Thread Tony Graziano
it does depend on how many people are using everything from the interface to instant messaging. That being said, 4gb should really be a starting point. On Feb 11, 2012 6:56 PM, "Todd Hodgen" wrote: > I don’t want to be contradictory here, but I have many small sites running > on 2gb memory, and 0

Re: [sipx-users] All phone registrations expiring

2012-02-11 Thread Todd Hodgen
I don't want to be contradictory here, but I have many small sites running on 2gb memory, and 0 swap used in 4-8 months of running that way. These sites have 5-40 phones on them and they are 100% reliable for me. I'm sure there is a tipping point to where 2 gb is not enough, but I've not seen it

Re: [sipx-users] All phone registrations expiring

2012-02-11 Thread Tony Graziano
I think you need at least 4GB ram installed on any system. There s no mystery here, just a lack of resources. When you start using swap on ANY system, performance suffers. Install more ram and you will see an immediate improvement. On Feb 11, 2012 5:29 PM, "Ken Ridley" wrote: > This is the inf

Re: [sipx-users] All phone registrations expiring

2012-02-11 Thread Tony Graziano
You should not be using any swap! On Feb 11, 2012 5:29 PM, "Ken Ridley" wrote: > This is the info I collected > > Shouldn’t it be using more of the swap? > > ** ** > > top - 14:02:47 up 3 days, 23:01, 1 user, load average: 1.17, 0.62, 0.38* > *** > > Tasks: 115 total, 3 running, 111

Re: [sipx-users] All phone registrations expiring

2012-02-11 Thread Ken Ridley
This is the info I collected Shouldn't it be using more of the swap? top - 14:02:47 up 3 days, 23:01, 1 user, load average: 1.17, 0.62, 0.38 Tasks: 115 total, 3 running, 111 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 2.3%us, 1.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 96.4%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem:

Re: [sipx-users] Off topic: Anyone using appia?

2012-02-11 Thread Tony Graziano
I have had no issue having them send to me on port 5080 using either method. I also can use their t.38 trunks to receive faxes in sipx or send from an fxs port using t.38. On Feb 11, 2012 4:16 PM, "m...@grounded.net" wrote: > The quality on the device which now works is great, the call setup tim

Re: [sipx-users] Off topic: Anyone using appia?

2012-02-11 Thread m...@grounded.net
The quality on the device which now works is great, the call setup time is the fastest we've seen for ITSP's. I like their tech support so far and can't say anything bad about them. Just wondered about the problems we've had, if others were experiencing the same things. I thought folks had re

Re: [sipx-users] Off topic: Anyone using appia?

2012-02-11 Thread Matt White
They are the sole provider we resell. They merged with voxitas about 2 years ago. We probably have several dozen accounts with appia. Haven't had any issues with functionaility. they have two platforms. One with register that picks up on port 5080 automatically. The other platform is IP ba

Re: [sipx-users] Off topic: Anyone using appia?

2012-02-11 Thread Gerald Drouillard
On 2/11/2012 1:22 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:04:08 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: >> They support (we have setup) both IP ACL trunks and registration trunks. >> Both work for us. >> >> You should ask your reseller to assist. It's not a difficult configuration. > As I said, m

Re: [sipx-users] Off topic: Anyone using appia?

2012-02-11 Thread m...@grounded.net
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:04:08 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > They support (we have setup) both IP ACL trunks and registration trunks. > Both work for us. > > You should ask your reseller to assist. It's not a difficult configuration. As I said, my vendor did work with them, we got into a conference

Re: [sipx-users] Off topic: Anyone using appia?

2012-02-11 Thread Tony Graziano
They support (we have setup) both IP ACL trunks and registration trunks. Both work for us. You should ask your reseller to assist. It's not a difficult configuration. On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:56 AM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:42:30 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > > I don't

Re: [sipx-users] Off topic: Anyone using appia?

2012-02-11 Thread m...@grounded.net
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:42:30 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > I don't think you are "handling them". Don't expect them to reach out to > you to resolve whatever issue you have. You need to contact them to push > whatever you need forward. There aren't any issues at our end. Like I said in my first me

Re: [sipx-users] Off topic: Anyone using appia?

2012-02-11 Thread Tony Graziano
I don't think you are "handling them". Don't expect them to reach out to you to resolve whatever issue you have. You need to contact them to push whatever you need forward. On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:39 AM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > > Yes. We have one account with them. They have t.38 if you a

Re: [sipx-users] Off topic: Anyone using appia?

2012-02-11 Thread m...@grounded.net
> Yes. We have one account with them. They have t.38 if you ask for > it. I am not a big fan of fix price "plan" pricing. I miss having > a voip.ms interface, and to be able to self serve, like if you have > to call forward from the ITSP side. I'm not too worried about the GUI side. Yes, I loo