Paul, in the TFPT directory, the files for managing the Polycom phones can
be found. You will notice that there is a .cfg file, and there
should be a [mac].cfg file as well. Open the file, and you will see that
there are lines for delineating the different models of Polycom phones that
ar
We just had our d-link response point server stolen. I am trying to
connected the phones and the gateway (model in the subject) to a sipxecs
server in a pinch, the phones work just need the gateway now. Any one
tried this before? I have kind of made it half way, they talk, but not
nicely. I hav
Not being critical, but you know you are testing with a legacy device. If
so, you probably have some around and are trying to re-use them. Read on...
You should ensure you are using the latest bootup/firmwarefrom polycom for
those EOL models by uploading them to sipxconfig portal, device
managemen
For these older phones, you will need to upload a compatible version of sip.ld
under " Legacy 3.1.X sip.ld" in the device files. Even if you had a recent
(meaning 3.2.x) set of firmware files uploaded and active, this would still be
an issue for you.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "
I created a new install of sipxecs (4.4.0) and want to register a
Polycom 501. I created a new phone device and added a line to it and
did a "Send Profiles" (which timed-out because the phone was not
online). I factory-defaulted the phone (4,6,8,* plus password). When I
reboot the phone, I can s
I'll be happy to fix whatever is broken, but please help me understand
first.
Are you saying that the problem results from my extensions registering
as e...@host.domain.com instead of e...@domain.com?
In a previous post I was told by someone that if I have no intention of
adding additional s
Its the fact you are registering to the host name instead of the domain.
Fix your DNS.
On Mar 30, 2012 1:41 PM, "Stiles Watson" wrote:
> I just noticed that since I upgraded sipX to 4.4 and my Polycom IP 335
> phones to firmware 3.2.6 and BootROM 4.2.2, I no longer get a v-mail
> notification on
I just noticed that since I upgraded sipX to 4.4 and my Polycom IP 335
phones to firmware 3.2.6 and BootROM 4.2.2, I no longer get a v-mail
notification on the Phones. The message indicator LED does not flash and
there is no indication on the display except "1 new missed call".
I do not know en
What you are asking 4 is not in the current design. If you look in the
tracker I think there is a teacher request for this among other things as
it relates to fax.
On Mar 30, 2012 12:11 PM, "Robert Schroeder" <
robert.schroe...@memberfirstmortgage.com> wrote:
> I did an extensive review of the mai
This do you know if you have been around for some time.
Consider looking through the tracker commenting on the case.
On Mar 30, 2012 11:10 AM, "Robert Schroeder" <
robert.schroe...@memberfirstmortgage.com> wrote:
> I am having problems in the CDR Calls (Historic) area. I can see the call
> infor
I did an extensive review of the mail log files for the times and dates in
question. It does appear that there was no faxes directed to the DID in
question with regards to a fax.
Thank you everyone for the help.
I still am concerned that there are not copies on the sipXecs server of the
TIFFS
Also, I'd recommend looking at /var/log/maillog to see if sendmail is
getting any error's sending them - possibly from the file being to big for
SMTP, etc.
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of George Ni
I was wondering if you caught that :)
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:42 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: voip.ms config
Grum
I can replicate this issue for many numbers listed on the (All) refresh. When I
select the From and select refresh I show nothing. Perhaps this problem is an
educational issue on my part. LOL
Hmm...
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org]
I am having problems in the CDR Calls (Historic) area. I can see the call
information listed on the Refresh will (All)
6132493900 6165889817 6165889817 3/29/12 4:59 PM 00:00:39 Completed
If I then change the drop down to (From) and place the (6132493900) in the
field and then select Refresh
My major concern too is that the CDR history is not showing a call to my fax
number and I have received multiple faxes. Know I believe that the CDR reports
are not reliable.
Hmm
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfound
I was able to find tiffs up to (/tmp/fax_2012-03-27-*). I do not see anything
else after that. I know that users are getting for faxes after that date. I
have even received faxes yesterday. This must not be the place to look for PDF
documents.
Good information to know.
Rob
-Original Messa
also look for tif or tiff
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Robert Schroeder <
robert.schroe...@memberfirstmortgage.com> wrote:
> I have tried to do a system scan of the *.pdf and I have had zero luck
> thus far locating them.
>
> ** **
>
> Rob
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list
your exact version matters (latest stable makes pdf as default unless
you've made a manual change).
your /var/log/maillog
should be the first place you look, or in your sendmail server queue or
undeliverables to see if it is an email issue first.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Robert Schroeder
I have conducted a find search and have not found any user emailed faxed
documents. The command that I used is listed below.
Find / *.pdf
Find / -iname *.pfd
Nothing found for any users.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf O
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Robert Schroeder
wrote:
> I have tried to do a system scan of the *.pdf and I have had zero luck thus
> far locating them.
>
>
>
> Rob
Is this same for tiff files? Asking because files are received as tiff
then converted to pdf, maybe there's something wrong. Chec
I have tried to do a system scan of the *.pdf and I have had zero luck thus far
locating them.
Rob
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of George Niculae
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 9:34 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sip
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Robert Schroeder <
robert.schroe...@memberfirstmortgage.com> wrote:
> I am trying to locate the faxed documents location on the sipXecs. I have
> callers reporting successful faxed documents however my users often say
> that the email never was received. Can someon
I am trying to locate the faxed documents location on the sipXecs. I have
callers reporting successful faxed documents however my users often say that
the email never was received. Can someone direct me to the location on the
server were these documents are stored.
Thanks Everyone,
Robert
I copied the sample from wiki and there were backslashes at some brackets.
After removing karoo loaded the parameters and now it works. J My fault
sorry. Thanks for your time…
*Von:* Joegen Baclor [mailto:jbac...@ezuce.com]
*Gesendet:* Freitag, 30. März 2012 13:33
*An:* Discussion list for use
By the way, did you restart karoo after you made the rtp port range
config? It requries a restart. not just a reload-config
On 03/30/2012 06:32 PM, Jan Fricke wrote:
OK found /var/log/karoo/sbc.log
Karoo seems to act as B2BUA.
Log shows:
10:16:52.303: [CID=22b5a92d] JS: Setting transac
Can you send the sbc.log as well?
On 03/30/2012 06:32 PM, Jan Fricke wrote:
OK found /var/log/karoo/sbc.log
Karoo seems to act as B2BUA.
Log shows:
10:16:52.303: [CID=22b5a92d] JS: Setting transaction property
require-rtp-proxy=1
Incoming SDP Part:
[CID=22b5a92d] s=Polyco
OK found /var/log/karoo/sbc.log
Karoo seems to act as B2BUA.
Log shows:
10:16:52.303: [CID=22b5a92d] JS: Setting transaction property
require-rtp-proxy=1
Incoming SDP Part:
[CID=22b5a92d] s=Polycom IP Phone
[CID=22b5a92d] c=IN IP4 10.99.148.60
Hi,
I’m currently struggling with the configuration of Karoo as SBC. My
Scenario is nearly the same like in the Configuration Sample in the wiki (
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Karoo+Configuration+Samples).
CentOS 6.2 64-bit with Karoo 1.4.0.0
Internet <-> Transparent Router (Fi
Ekiga is a dead-end. It supports qop.
On 03/30/2012 05:35 PM, Joegen Baclor wrote:
> I'll test with Ekiga soon. Let me get back to you on this. I am just
> preparing a 4.4 dev box.
>
>
> On 03/30/2012 05:23 PM, Jan Fricke wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Thanks for obligation Jeogen and Douglas.
>> yum updat
BTW, do you have the registrar log handy?
On 03/30/2012 05:23 PM, Jan Fricke wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for obligation Jeogen and Douglas.
> yum updated and unfortunately it still does'nt work.
>
> sipxregistry x86_64
> 4.4.0-375.g7849esipXecs
> 23
I'll test with Ekiga soon. Let me get back to you on this. I am just
preparing a 4.4 dev box.
On 03/30/2012 05:23 PM, Jan Fricke wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for obligation Jeogen and Douglas.
> yum updated and unfortunately it still does'nt work.
>
> sipxregistry x86_64
> 4
Hi,
Thanks for obligation Jeogen and Douglas.
yum updated and unfortunately it still does'nt work.
sipxregistry x86_64
4.4.0-375.g7849esipXecs
235 k
[root@sipx ~]# /etc/init.d/sipxecs
...
[root@sipx ~]# tshark -R "sip"
Running as user "root" an
OK, pushed fix to stage area. Can folks retest? thanks!
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Joegen Baclor wrote:
>
> Douglas,
>
> After looking at the logs, I realized that the registrar performs it's own
> authorization. We therefore need to also get rid of qop checking in
> SipRegistryServer.
34 matches
Mail list logo
