On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:28:17 -0400, Michael Picher wrote:
> And, now, what setting is it specifically that is programmed in the router
> you are worried about? And how many of them are you talking about here?
Only a handful but none in just one area.
The authentication information isn't going t
And, now, what setting is it specifically that is programmed in the router
you are worried about? And how many of them are you talking about here?
On Jun 24, 2012 11:04 AM, "m...@grounded.net" wrote:
> They are all Linksys RT31P2-NA. Users were supposed to put them just
> behind their providers
Is that what you mean, what the remotes are using?
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 05:02:31 -0400, Michael Picher wrote:
> What are these routers you speak of?
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:23 AM, m...@grounded.net
> wrote:
>> Their routers are all statically set with the old domain name and user
>> authen
Ayuh...
On Jun 24, 2012 8:54 AM, "m...@mattkeys.net" wrote:
> So with a LACP (802.3ad) trunk presented as bond0 I can throw as many as I
> want at it?
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Micha
No. It no longer automatically puts "operator" in as the "Incoming Calls
Desitnation", but that does not affect anything other than how to configure
DID's, which people would have to know anyway.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Kurt Albershardt wrote:
> Thanks - think I'll give sipXbridge a wh
Thanks - think I'll give sipXbridge a whirl.
I notice that http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/SIP+Trunking has not
been updated since April 2011. Are there changes I should be aware of?
On Jun 24, 2012, at 9:28 , Tony Graziano wrote:
> Sipxbridge is just an option. A properly configur
Sipxbridge is just an option. A properly configured SBC works well too. It
absolutely depends on your requirements.
On Jun 24, 2012 10:49 AM, "Kurt Albershardt" wrote:
> Given my past VoIP experiences (it's been a few years), I just was about
> to ask why sipX would not support multiple NICs and
They are all Linksys RT31P2-NA. Users were supposed to put them just behind
their providers so we could get at them if we needed to change anything but
some folks put them behind their own routers so we can't get at them. Since I
can't change the router info, it would be cool if I could simply c
Given my past VoIP experiences (it's been a few years), I just was about to ask
why sipX would not support multiple NICs and then it hit me: While multiple
NICs make perfect sense in a B2BUA architecture, they really do not for a pure
SIP proxy design.
Is sipXbridge still the preferred path fo
So with a LACP (802.3ad) trunk presented as bond0 I can throw as many as I want
at it?
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Picher
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 5:01 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
S
What are these routers you speak of?
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:23 AM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
> Their routers are all statically set with the old domain name and user
> authentication details.
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:36:38 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
> > That will work but not the "best" w
You can bond interfaces today... As long as the interfaces present
themselves to the Linux system as a single network interface. You can then
have connections to multiple switches for a diverse path.
Thanks,
Mike
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:00 AM, m...@mattkeys.net wrote:
> I'd love to know
12 matches
Mail list logo
