This makes a lot of sense to me.
On Aug 18, 2012, at 5:03 , Michael Picher wrote:
> The other option here, which is where I had hoped were were heading with 4.6,
> is to have a userID and an Extension field (not extension as an alias). This
> way, a userID is really a userID and an extension
Historically this has to do with loop detection. Hopefully when a new hunt
group service is developed we'll be able to work around this as it will be
a B2BUA based service.
Mike
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Yes a sipx thing. What I typically do it if I need to bring
The other option here, which is where I had hoped were were heading with
4.6, is to have a userID and an Extension field (not extension as an
alias). This way, a userID is really a userID and an extension is really
an extension (that gets displayed / programmed into a phone).
Thanks,
Mike
On F
