Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread darthzejdr
I reinstalled my sipx according to your setup. 201 is registered on primary server(with ip address in domain, 92.168.0.46) 200 is registered on secondary server(with ip address in domain, 192.168.0.47) 201 to 200 works normaly 200 to 201 gives error user is temporarily unavailable(404) 200

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread darthzejdr
I've done a few more tests(extensions registered with normal domain(callidus.local) but using proxy field with ip adress) but again the same problem. II can make calls from primary server to sacondary, but the only way to make a call from secondary server is to use 201@192.168.0.46 as the number i

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread Joegen Baclor
Please send snapshots with both proxy and registrar in debug level. On 10/02/2012 07:08 PM, darthzejdr wrote: I've done a few more tests(extensions registered with normal domain(callidus.local) but using proxy field with ip adress) but again the same problem. II can make calls from primary

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread darthzejdr
https://www.dropbox.com/s/iwiatrnvkf7fh9a/sipx-snapshot-sipx1.callidus.local .tar.gz https://www.dropbox.com/s/xwjq7q2px45b4sn/sipx-snapshot-sipx2.callidus.local .tar.gz calls are: 201 - 200 works 200 - 201 doesn't work 200 - 201@192.168.0.46 works From: Joegen Baclor

Re: [sipx-users] Outgoing calls - sipgate

2012-10-02 Thread George Niculae
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Mladen Gulan mladen.gu...@callidus.hr wrote: Hi, I am testing outgoing calls via sipgate sip trunk, incoming calls are working, but for outgoing calls i am getting „forbidden“. I gave all permission to my extension and create a dial plan. Snapshoot is in the

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread George Niculae
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:56 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote: https://www.dropbox.com/s/iwiatrnvkf7fh9a/sipx-snapshot-sipx1.callidus.local.tar.gz https://www.dropbox.com/s/xwjq7q2px45b4sn/sipx-snapshot-sipx2.callidus.local.tar.gz calls are: 201 - 200 works 200 - 201 doesn't

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread darthzejdr
I'm not behind nat, i am in the same subnet as my servers. Also what should i put in public ip address? Each servers own address, primary server address, or something else? -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread George Niculae
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not behind nat, i am in the same subnet as my servers. Also what should i put in public ip address? Each servers own address, primary server address, or something else? You should put each server own address. George

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread darthzejdr
Changed to ip address, everything is still the same -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of George Niculae Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 2:11 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread George Niculae
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:16 PM, darthzejdr darthze...@gmail.com wrote: Changed to ip address, everything is still the same IMO it really looks like the domain alias issue we seen in latest 4.4 build, will need Joegen's call to be sure

Re: [sipx-users] Outgoing calls - sipgate

2012-10-02 Thread George Niculae
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Mladen Gulan mladen.gu...@callidus.hr wrote: Hi, Put back sipx bridge external port to 5080, restart services, still the same. Didn`t change nat traversal, i am behind the nat with dynamic ip (adsl) It still looks like a NAT issue, if you're looking in

[sipx-users] Danish Language Pack

2012-10-02 Thread Sven Evensen
Anyone know if this exists for sipx 4.4? Sven -- *Sven Evensen, Operations Consultant* *OnRelay* Elizabeth House │ 39 York Road, London SE1 7NQ, UK │ +44 (0) 207 902 8123 │ mailto:sven.even...@onrelay.com sven.even...@onrelay.com │ www.onrelay.com This electronic message transmission

[sipx-users] Weighting on ACD

2012-10-02 Thread Aaron Carlson
Hi folks, I'm hoping someone might have a minute to explain some call weighting scenarios to me. I'm trying to set up the following situation : I have an ACD queue with 9 agents in it, plus a manager who should only get a call if all agents are busy. I'm not certain what hapens if I set it up

Re: [sipx-users] Danish Language Pack

2012-10-02 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Sven Evensen sven.even...@onrelay.com wrote: Anyone know if this exists for sipx 4.4? I once weeded out all the tarballs I could find and created proper projects for them. References to github projects are here

Re: [sipx-users] Weighting on ACD

2012-10-02 Thread Gerald Drouillard
On 10/2/2012 3:04 PM, Aaron Carlson wrote: Hi folks, I'm hoping someone might have a minute to explain some call weighting scenarios to me. I'm trying to set up the following situation : I have an ACD queue with 9 agents in it, plus a manager who should only get a call if all agents are

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread Joegen Baclor
George, the log below is for determining caller-id and has nothing to do with user or domain alias. For the meantime, can you make something out of this log. Registrar is unable to route to the user mailbox.

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6 Cluster

2012-10-02 Thread Joegen Baclor
Hi, Thanks for the snapshots. Based on the logs that was available in the registrar of the secondary node, it was able to redirect properly to the phone SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily\r From: \200\sip:200@192.168.0.47;tag=ab5d6542\r To: sip:201@192.168.0.47;tag=AbhEaS\r Call-Id:

Re: [sipx-users] ] SipXecs not transferring calls

2012-10-02 Thread Joegen Baclor
Luis, Unfortunately, the snapshot does not contain a single INVITE in the logs. Please do a log rotate or simply delete sipXproxy.log and do the test again. Send the proxy log instead of the whole snapshot. It should give us the information we need to shed some light on your issue. Are