Henry, I can't speak to the router, or your ITSP provider. I can state
that I have a site running on 4.4 with a single server, server provides DHCP
and DNS, and works with SPA942 phones. I did not use the wiki
recommendations. I simply provisioned them via the management templates and
they
sipXecs 4.4.0 has no firewall enabled, so if you have your system raw on
the internet or you have port 25 open inbound to it you could have some
sort of DoS related thing going on.
clean out your mail directory, disallow external connections to the server
and see what happens.
doesn't sound like
And beware of those Cisco RV series 'firewalls'. In the past with 1-to-1
NAT I've noted that they actually just open up ALL ports. Scary as hell...
Run away... run towards pfSense.
Mike
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Todd Hodgen thod...@frontier.com wrote:
Henry, I can’t speak to the
this is not a valid system user unless you have manually added it to the
system. I do think the logs would show more if access was granted. Why are
you exposing sshd to the outside world with an acl or by protecting it at
your firewall?
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Noah Mehl
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Tony Graziano
tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote:
this is not a valid system user unless you have manually added it to the
system. I do think the logs would show more if access was granted. Why are
you exposing sshd to the outside world with an acl or by
Thank you to all who have given me suggestions. I'll follow-up on those
suggestions.
Best regards,
Henry Kwan
From: Michael Picher mpic...@ezuce.com
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Cc: Henry Kwan
Hello,
After a recent change to daylight savings (time moved forward one hour)
all of our messages are coming through spark with timestamps an hour in
the past
I have already corrected the device timezone, and the server time
reported through both the Linux console and through sipxconfig are
... more -- its a user that does not have login to the OS itself, just
vsftpd, which is restricted to certain commands and must present a
request for its mac address in order to get a configuration file. It
is not logging into linux unless someone changed the rights of the
user.
On Fri, Oct 12,
Hi All,
anyone with polycom and 4.6 handy to give BLF a try? Don't know why
yet but I cannot get buttons on TUI
Thanks
George
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
On 10/11/2012 11:48 PM, Noah Mehl wrote:
All,
I just realized that my emails from my SipXecs 4.4 server were not being
delivered. Upon further investigation, I found that my SipXecs VM had a
sendmail queue with over 13000 messages in it. I'm trying to figure out how
my machine was
Hi Todd,
Thank you for your response and your assurance that the combination of SPA942
and SipXecs 4.4 works.
I am just curious regarding the transfer to voice mail since I am not
knowledgeable on the sequence of operation. How is the signalling different
between transfer to voice mail
Are you configuring the spa942 manually? If so, do t do that and let sipx
configure it. Resist the urge to change the configuration for the phone
within sipx. Explain how you are configured (is sipx DNS and dhcp server),
etc.
On Oct 12, 2012 10:27 AM, Henry Kwan hslk...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Hi Todd,
A customer is using an ITSP which does not support re-invite, therefore we
set it up an unmanaged gateway and REFER is used when doing a transfer. If
an external call comes through SIP trunk to an AA 200 and the AA does a
transfer to say 211, the refer back to the SIP trunk will have refer-to as
I do not blame you for not wanting to do it that way.
It would be better to find an ITSP who supports REFER.
If you use sipxbridge and set it up as a trunk it (sipxbridge) will
handle the refer locally. It would need the ITSP to support re-invite.
If you set it up as an unmanaged gateway then
Thanks Tony, you confirmed what I was afraid of.
And Yes, we are very close to saying we just cannot use this ITSP.
Our last hope is that we have a plugin where we possibly can intercept the
refer and replace the internal number with the full DID.
Of course some internal numbers might not have a
Or your plugin will have to reference a db.
It reminds me of a couple of itsp's I struggled with in mexico and
Australia. Callcentric certainly comes to mind.
On Oct 12, 2012 11:25 AM, Sven Evensen sven.even...@onrelay.com wrote:
Thanks Tony, you confirmed what I was afraid of.
And Yes, we
Update #21
==
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has *not* been rebuilt as decided in release policy. Yum update
after installation is recommended for getting these updates.
- Thank you all for your continued testing and
we're pushing openuc today for you guys... dave will contact when ready.
thanks,
mike
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
Update #21
==
- ** No security updates in this update **
- ISO has
18 matches
Mail list logo
