Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Busy Problem

2012-10-25 Thread Michael Picher
Jan, One thing you might check is your channel selection order. Outbound you should be selecting channels from 30 (or 23 in the US) down. Inbound your service provider should be ringing in 1 and up. This helps to avoid the old telcom problem called glare. Glare occurs when a device picks up a

Re: [sipx-users] New 4.6 Beta Installation

2012-10-25 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Aaron Pursell aar...@esgw.org wrote: At least I'm not crazySo assuming this is an issue beyond something we can do. 1.) Is it possible the numeric id of second server is not 2? Can you send me screen shot of the list of servers? 2.) Can you run date

Re: [sipx-users] New 4.6 Beta Installation

2012-10-25 Thread Aaron Pursell
I uploaded all the stuff to the dropbox you shared with me. Server 2 gave the following error during sipx-snapshot. [root@gfgwph ~]# sipx-snapshot pg_dump: [archiver (db)] connection to database SIPXCONFIG failed: could not connect to server: No such file or directory Is the server

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

2012-10-25 Thread Trevor L Benson
Mike, We have ACL's, Views, and split the zone into an internal AND external zone already. We are returning internal IP's to the RFC 1918's defined in our internal ACL and view for external carries any and has a modified zone that includes the A record for the public entry instead of the

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

2012-10-25 Thread Trevor L Benson
Tony, Wouldn't the same be said for an unmanaged firewall then? Moving firewall to unmanaged and manually creating your own tables and rules has been suggested more than once as how to control iptables, no suggestion that the system at some point would add/remove or reset the rules was

Re: [sipx-users] New 4.6 Beta Installation

2012-10-25 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Aaron Pursell aar...@esgw.org wrote: I uploaded all the stuff to the dropbox you shared with me. thanks, this was useful in that it proved we need to add more info to snapshot script. We need to be able to diagnose 4.6 more easily. Then I may ask you to yum

Re: [sipx-users] Getting 483 Too Many Hops Error

2012-10-25 Thread Brian Buckles
All, Thanks for help.  This has been resolved by BroadVox after they worked with the provider that the toll free numbers are on, to increase the Max Forwards to 67. From: Brian Buckles itnc...@yahoo.com To: Brian Buckles itnc...@yahoo.com; Discussion list

Re: [sipx-users] New 4.6 Beta Installation

2012-10-25 Thread Aaron Pursell
Not a problem, just let me know. I just updated to the latest release out on the repo. Aaron Pursell Network Security Administrator Easter Seals-Goodwill Northern Rocky Mountain, Inc. 4400 Central Ave Great Falls, Montana 59405 (406) 771-3721 aar...@esgw.org Douglas Hubler

Re: [sipx-users] New 4.6 Beta Installation

2012-10-25 Thread sk
Sent wirelessly from my BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Aaron Pursell aar...@esgw.org Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:32:25 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs softwaresipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Reply-To: Discussion list for users

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

2012-10-25 Thread George Niculae
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Alan Worstell aworst...@a-1networks.com wrote: Hello, As Trevor mentioned, replacing /etc/named.conf.unmanaged with our changed conf resolved this. I had noticed in sipxagent.log entries about fulfilling promises from that file. Attached is the log file in

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

2012-10-25 Thread Alan Worstell
Hello, My earlier reply to the list is currently held in moderation (I believe because I attached another log which was slightly larger) but named.conf is still actually being overwritten. /etc/named.conf.unmanaged still has our changes, but /etc/named.conf keeps going back to the default. Here

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

2012-10-25 Thread George Niculae
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Alan Worstell aworst...@a-1networks.com wrote: Hello, My earlier reply to the list is currently held in moderation (I believe because I attached another log which was slightly larger) but named.conf is still actually being overwritten. /etc/named.conf.unmanaged

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

2012-10-25 Thread George Niculae
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:19 AM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Alan Worstell aworst...@a-1networks.com wrote: Hello, My earlier reply to the list is currently held in moderation (I believe because I attached another log which was slightly larger) but

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

2012-10-25 Thread Alan Worstell
Yes, this is correct, it was set to managed in the gui again. I know that it *was* set to unmanaged, because I had to create the cfengine script to allow udp 53 through the local firewall. I've set it to unmanaged again. Alan Worstell A1 Networks - Systems Administrator VTSP, dCAA, LPIC-1,