Re: [sipx-users] 4.4.0 to 4.4.6

2012-10-18 Thread Andrew Pitman
Thanks George! I tried it again today and verified it works. It seems that the heard/unheard status of voicemails is not preserved though. All messages were "new" after the import. It's no biggie, but is this something that is being worked on or something we'll just have to deal with? Thank

Re: [sipx-users] new patch for XX-10177

2012-06-21 Thread Andrew Pitman
Joegen, I don't mind at all. I've got a couple of servers with the patch already applied. I'll point my new "DOS generator" at those and watch for a few days. ;) -- Sent from my iPhone appendage On Jun 21, 2012, at 12:50, Joegen Baclor wrote: > On 06/21/2012 10:34 PM, andrewpitman wrote: >>

Re: [sipx-users] new patch for XX-10177

2012-06-19 Thread Andrew Pitman
r other probable causes. > > On 06/20/2012 09:17 AM, Andrew Pitman wrote: >> Hi Joegen, >> >> Actually, after a couple of days running it with the delay, I took the 2 >> second sleep out of the Perl script and ran it continuously from a while >> loop in the she

Re: [sipx-users] new patch for XX-10177

2012-06-19 Thread Andrew Pitman
Sure, I'll give that a try. -- Sent from my iPhone appendage On Jun 19, 2012, at 22:00, Joegen Baclor wrote: > Andrew, > > Another possibility is TCP. We are sending it UDP currently. Can you also > try sending through TCP? > > On 06/20/2012 09:17 AM, Andrew Pit

Re: [sipx-users] new patch for XX-10177

2012-06-19 Thread Andrew Pitman
Hi Joegen, Actually, after a couple of days running it with the delay, I took the 2 second sleep out of the Perl script and ran it continuously from a while loop in the shell. Still no dice. I could make it tighter still by looping in the Perl script with no sleeps. ;) Andy -- Sent from my iP