rgxv zxv wrote:
> I am usıng Nortel 1535 phones and i created new User and after trying to
> register it, i saw "Successfully registered".
> That is why i am thinking that it is registered. But i can not find the
> reason of why i am getting 404.
>
> May it be related to TCP/UDP?
> Besides, do i h
Richey wrote:
> I am trying to get a test SipX box up and running so I can demo it for a
> few guys. I am having a problem getting some Polycom 550 phones to
> register. The phones can get their config from the SipX box but they
> won’t register.Using wireshark I can see:
>
>
>
> Reques
Jeremy A wrote:
>
> The phone will accept an MWI NOTIFY from any party at any time and
> responds with a 200 OK and sets its lights accordingly.
>
So that would be why the old subscription dialogs are not being
terminated, and you are seeing multiple NOTIFYs. The phone should only
accept valid
Jeremy A wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have sipxecs 3.10.2 installed and a number of Linksys SPA962 phones
> connected.
>
> I have enabled subscribe for MWI on the phones - which works. What is a
> problem is that every time I reboot the phone a new subscription is made
> without clearing the old ones
In sipx web UI
System >> Dial Plans >> Voicemail >> Internal station extension length
Set that to 4 and it should support 4 digit extensions
Arjun
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Canfield
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 5:43 PM
Cc: sipx
As far as I can tell, the reason for the mismatch in the received nonce
and the calculated nonce is because the "From Tag" in the Register
message containing the auth credentials, is different from the previous
two Register messages.. Now, I can't find any literature on whether this
is an acceptabl
MoH can be configured if the UA supports -
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sipping/draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples/dra
ft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt - Section 2.3. The MoH server
uri, on sipX, is usually sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arjun.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
