Re: [sipx-users] Replication autoattendants.xml fails

2009-10-01 Thread Ingomar de Jesus
Replication completes now. However default operator got no actions requiring parameters and it still doesn't transfer. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: htt

Re: [sipx-users] Replication autoattendants.xml fails

2009-10-01 Thread Ingomar de Jesus
I don't really understand what to do with the patches. Copy them to certain directories? Or edit certain files? Please provide CentOS full path of these. Thanks Ingomar ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive:

[sipx-users] Replication autoattendants.xml fails

2009-10-01 Thread Ingomar de Jesus
Currently the default operator receives the call. Next it says to hold while transferring the call when extension is pressed. The call never really gets transferred though. It just remains silent. Normal transfer works fine. What's the path of autoattendants.xml in CentOS? Maybe another one can be

[sipx-users] GSM support?

2009-09-28 Thread ingomar
Searching "GSM" on SIPfoundry Wiki yields 0 results, so does sipX support GSM gateways? http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=GSM&ns0=1&fulltext=Search ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archiv

[sipx-users] Incoming calls thru GSM gateway only with phone's IP

2009-09-23 Thread ingomar
I got a GSM gateway setup in similar way as PSTN gateway. Unlike the AudioCodes MP-108 (PSTN), the Sun Comm SC-375 (GSM) doesn't complete calls when in 2-stage mode and a phone extension is chosen. It only completes when the phone's IP is. It doesn't complete 1-stage either. Anybody else got undesi

[sipx-users] Upgrading from 4.0.0 to 4.0.2

2009-09-22 Thread ingomar
I tried upgrading via command line interface and it didn't work. Even manually editing /etc/yum.repos.d/sipxecs-stable-centos.repo with the right URL, sipX says 'HTTP Error 404: Not Found'. The CD doesn't seem to include a way to upgrade without clean installation. Primary and redundant servers can

Re: [sipx-users] Redundant registration for a limited period

2009-08-28 Thread ingomar
Each server is the DNS & DHCP server for its LAN. > Are you supplying multiple DNS servers to the phones through DHCP? > > Mike ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsub

[sipx-users] Redundant registration for a limited period

2009-08-28 Thread ingomar
I tested redundant registration with physically separate servers in HA system with DNS SRV load balancing. Only a router allows communication between the LAN segments. The phones are connected on the Primary LAN segment. First I make sure all phones are registered, then I unplug the Primary server

[sipx-users] New link AudioCodes guide

2009-08-04 Thread ingomar
This was the link where we could find this guide prior to decommission of Pingtel.com... http://www.pingtel.com/onlinedocs/AudioCodes/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=Working_with_Your_Gateway&file=AudioCodes_v46a_Interop_Guide.1.6.html Where can we find it now?

[sipx-users] Discrepancy between sipX time and phone time

2009-07-23 Thread ingomar
Since installation our Soundpoint phones had the same time as sipXconfig but recently without any change concerning time parameters, the phones are 55 minutes behind sipx. Last change was implementing true load balancing and the phones kept the same time after that - independent of to which server

[sipx-users] BLF on Soundpoint

2009-07-21 Thread ingomar
What steps should one take to have BLF on Soundpoint phones? Preferred result is that a user can see his/her contact status at all times without even attempting to call him/her. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive:

[sipx-users] Dynamic registration

2009-07-15 Thread ingomar
When Polycom Soundpoint phones registration expire while Primary is offline (network cable unplugged), they auto-register on Redundant server. But when I reboot them manually before they expire with Primary offline, they won't register. How come? These phones get registration via TFTP. Is there ma

[sipx-users] Integral load balancing

2009-07-13 Thread ingomar
Today we got partial load balancing - Redundant servers that only provide critical processes in case Primary fails to do so. The next step can be integral load balancing - Mirror servers that evenly distribute all features/services with Primary. ___ sip

Re: [sipx-users] No MOH by Redundant server

2009-07-13 Thread ingomar
Which other services are not supported by Redundant server? Will they be in future releases? > [please do not reply to an existing message when starting a new topic- it messes up threading] > > On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 14:24 -0400, ingo...@netvision.an wrote: >> MOH not heard when Primary server is

[sipx-users] No MOH by Redundant server

2009-07-13 Thread ingomar
MOH not heard when Primary server is offline and calls are handled by Redundant. Currently only Primary provides MOH. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http

Re: [sipx-users] Which factors influence HA Registration?

2009-07-07 Thread ingomar
I'm running a test with Polycom Soundpoint 320, 501 and 650. SipX gives this error as well... Starting DHCP server test. Socket Bind Exception: Address already in use DHCPACK responce received. Message Type: DHCPACK Server Identifier: 192.168.10.133 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 Router: 192.

Re: [sipx-users] Which factors influence HA Registration?

2009-07-03 Thread ingomar
I know sipXsupervisor is one of the services, but how does it relate to Registrar (and other services)? How can it be configured? > Make sure sipXsupervisor is working correctly between the two. > > > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 14:28 -0400, ingo...@ wrote: >> I got phones expiring after 2000 t

[sipx-users] Which factors influence HA Registration?

2009-07-03 Thread ingomar
I got phones expiring after 2000 to 3000 seconds. And they won't register again by themselves. How can this be solved? I didn't have this issue when I tested them in a non-HA configuration. Both Registrars on Primary and Redundant servers are running OK. ___

Re: [sipx-users] Routing incoming PSTN or GSM calls

2009-06-30 Thread ingomar
For PSTN and GSM I use respectively Audiocodes MP-108 and Sun Comm SC-375. Audiocodes call routing works. Check out Automatic Dialing on page 18 of this guide... http://www.pingtel.com/onlinedocs/AudioCodes/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=Working_with_Your_Gateway&file=AudioCodes_v46a

Re: [sipx-users] Routing incoming PSTN or GSM calls

2009-06-25 Thread ingomar
Current result: 1)Someone calls in via PSTN. 2)Auto-attendant responds and the person can choose to transfer to user phone. Preferred result: 1)Someone calls in via PSTN. 2)User phone rings immediately without auto-attendant intervention. ___ sipx-user

[sipx-users] Routing incoming PSTN or GSM calls

2009-06-25 Thread ingomar
With auto-attendant disabled, incoming PSTN or GSM calls are not routed to any extension whatsoever. How does sipX (by default) route these calls? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive