On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> 4.2.0 rpms are missing altogether
RPMs and repo files for 4.2.0 are now available
http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/sipxecs-4.2.0-centos-i386.repo
http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/sipxecs-4.2.0-centos-x86-64.repo
__
Confirmed.
All nodes in the cluster will need to be re-installed, however.
On 08/17/2010 02:32 PM, Heather L. Sanders wrote:
> If this is not a possibility, do you think that a re-install to 4.2.0,
> followed by a restore from 4.2.1 backup files will result in a working
> system running 4.2.0?
--
Previously they were at sipxecssw.org. That is now forwarding to
sipfoundry.org.
Who controls sipxecssw.org DNS? Is it possible for us to add them to
sipfoundry repos and get them from someone at avaya?
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:01 AM,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
> you could just 'tweak' a 4.2.1 repo file to point at the 4.2.0 rpm files...
4.2.0 rpms are missing altogether
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list
you could just 'tweak' a 4.2.1 repo file to point at the 4.2.0 rpm files...
MIke
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Heather L. Sanders
> wrote:
> > When I go to http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/ , I can see
> that a
> > repo exis
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Heather L. Sanders wrote:
> When I go to http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/ , I can see that a
> repo exists for every version of sipX in the upgrade path, except for
> 4.2.0. There is an iso for it, but not a repo. What are the chances of
> getting a re
When I go to http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/ , I can see
that a repo exists for every version of sipX in the upgrade path, except
for 4.2.0. There is an iso for it, but not a repo. What are the
chances of getting a repo put back up so that I can do some rollback
testing?
If this is n
