On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 12:47 -0300, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Any comments if the test version of 3.1 firmware is usable with 3.10.2
> and whether moh works with it?
SipX 3.10.2 doesn't configure MOH in Polycoms, but Polycom 3.1 firmware
does MOH correctly. The sipXconfig work to support MOH is minor
Any comments if the test version of 3.1 firmware is usable with 3.10.2
and whether moh works with it?
>>> "Martin Steinmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/14/2008 4:34:16 PM
>>>
>
>paging and intercom work on the ciscos as far as i know (i tried them
on
>a 7960 a while back), but paging requires adding a
5, 2008 9:50 AM
> To: Matt White; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Alternative to Polycom
>
> I just picked up a Snom 370 to test with. The logic behind that choice
> was that the SipX website says the support for it is great, plus it
> does MOH. MOH is a
:41 AM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Alternative to Polycom
Yes, the linksys name does not give my business customers the "warm and
fuzzies".
The problem with the Nortel phones is that the product line is so diverse. You
have Nortel, then you have LG-Norte
nday, July 14, 2008 7:12 PM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Alternative to Polycom
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Matt White wrote:
>
> > We typically use polycom phones for our sip deployments. But every
> > now and then we c
paging , intercom and presence work on Aastra , but intercom requires setting
"Ring time" parameter to 0 or adding delay parameter to Alert-Info header
(;info=alert-autoanswer;delay=0).
-Shruthi Harish
Matt White wrote:
> We typically use polycom phones for our sip deployments. But every now
--Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sipx-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos Alvarez
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 7:12 PM
> To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Alternative to Polycom
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM,
I'll take a look at the those linksys phones. If you ever get a chance to test
paging and intercom functions please report your progress.
-Matt
>>> Carlos Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/14/08 7:12 PM >>>
On Jul 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Matt White wrote:
> We typically use polycom phones for our
On Jul 14, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Matt White wrote:
> We typically use polycom phones for our sip deployments. But every
> now and then we come across a customer that just doesn't like the
> polycom phones.
>
> Can anybody suggest a line of phones that is as well supported as
> polycom??
As w
>
>paging and intercom work on the ciscos as far as i know (i tried them
on
>a 7960 a while back), but paging requires adding a separate extension
>that is set to autoanswer, then making that part of the paging group
>instead of the main extension. kind of a pain, but it works.
>
>it's kind of fun
that polycom is considered "well-supported" but
frickin' music on hold doesn't work.
milosz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt White
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 2:16 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [s
We typically use polycom phones for our sip deployments. But every now and
then we come across a customer that just doesn't like the polycom phones.
Can anybody suggest a line of phones that is as well supported as polycom??
Specifically, things like paging, intercom and presence support are a
12 matches
Mail list logo
