Thanks all. On to 4.4…
Jeff
On Aug 4, 2011, at 6:28 PM, Michael Picher wrote:
> You whacky developers with your tricky naming schemes...
>
> On Aug 4, 2011 6:20 PM, "George Niculae" wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
> >> Looks like it may have been back-ported t
You whacky developers with your tricky naming schemes...
On Aug 4, 2011 6:20 PM, "George Niculae" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
>> Looks like it may have been back-ported to 4.2.1 but I don't think a new
>> build has been cranked for 4.2.1.
>> Mike
>>
>
> Actually
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Michael Picher wrote:
> Looks like it may have been back-ported to 4.2.1 but I don't think a new
> build has been cranked for 4.2.1.
> Mike
>
Actually was not backported, read master-4.2 as release-4.6. For
sipxecs 4.2.1 there is release-4.2
George
> On Thu, Aug
Looks like it may have been back-ported to 4.2.1 but I don't think a new
build has been cranked for 4.2.1.
Mike
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> I'm mighty certain it is:
>
> http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9699
>
> If so, no amount of staring at it will fix it for yo
I'm mighty certain it is:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9699
If so, no amount of staring at it will fix it for you in 4.2.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Jeff Gilmore wrote:
> Thanks Josh. Not sure that applies, though, since I am not running a 4.4
> version and that looked like a ne
Thanks Josh. Not sure that applies, though, since I am not running a 4.4
version and that looked like a new bug in 4.4. I will eventually update to
4.4, but I have had so much user downtime lately due to ITSP issues, that I
just can't face it!
The behavior on the Polycom looks like what happe
This may be related to a bug regarding PRACK:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9699
the only suggestion I have at this point is to upgrade to the latest 4.4
release
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Jeff Gilmore wrote:
> I have a problem that has cropped up recently. My extensions are most
I have a problem that has cropped up recently. My extensions are mostly served
by SPA2102 ATA devices, but on a particular extension, I have both a Polycom
IP320 and an SPA2102 ATA registered. Until recently, it worked great and I
could pick up incoming calls on either one.
Now, if I receive
