Appreciated !
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 8:55 PM
To: jcanfi...@emstar.com
Cc: mpic...@cmctechgroup.com; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org;
jun@msn.com
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Entries of intranet subnets of
The remote takes on the IP address of the remote public IP as seen by
sipxbridge. At least that's what I believe.
>>> Jim Canfield 07/07/09 8:26 AM >>>
Just out of curiosity, what happens in when you have a scenario where
a remote worker happens to have a subnet matching an intranet entry?
On T
Just out of curiosity, what happens in when you have a scenario where
a remote worker happens to have a subnet matching an intranet entry?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Tony
Graziano wrote:
> I think if the site he is on is 192.168.2.x and there is a remotely connected
> subnet via site-to-site
I think if the site he is on is 192.168.2.x and there is a remotely connected
subnet via site-to-site VPN of 192.168.3.x, both need to be listed in sipx,
since they router privately to each other.
If the remote site is a remote "user" and not connected via site-to-site VPN,
the remote subnet sho
