On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 08:59 +0100, kenny.mitch...@ineos.com wrote:
>
> Thanks Scott,
>
> the environment is a large campus switched network running over fibre
> optic, there's no NAT involved at all. Likewise with our WAN,
> globally we're all on the same registered IP ranges, so I'm not doing
it to 4 days or something?
Kenny Mitchell
INEOS Refinery
Grangemouth
From:
"Scott Lawrence"
To:
Kenny Mitchell/GB/OP-EU/in...@ineos
Cc:
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Date:
06/04/2009 17:22
Subject:
Re: [sipx-users] HA sanity check
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 16:31 +0100, kenny.mitc
kenny.mitch...@ineos.com wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been asked to write up a document comparing a possible Sip-X
> install with our current telephony systems, and I just wanted to check
> with you guys to see if I'm going way off the mark here. So far all I
> have is a single test server run
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 16:31 +0100, kenny.mitch...@ineos.com wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been asked to write up a document comparing a possible Sip-X
> install with our current telephony systems, and I just wanted to check
> with you guys to see if I'm going way off the mark here. So far all I
>
Hi all,
I've been asked to write up a document comparing a possible Sip-X install
with our current telephony systems, and I just wanted to check with you
guys to see if I'm going way off the mark here. So far all I have is a
single test server running 20 or so users via an Audiocodes gateway,
