Thanks for the good explanation and pfSense HowTo:)
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 12:23 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Sorry. the first paragraph answers your question I think.
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Tony Graziano
> wrote:
> Most firewalls randomize ports (rewrite the source port) o
Sorry. the first paragraph answers your question I think.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Most firewalls randomize ports (rewrite the source port) of outbound
> traffic. This is problematic for some protocols (like PPTP, IPSEC and SIP).
> sipXbridge needs static port NA
Most firewalls randomize ports (rewrite the source port) of outbound
traffic. This is problematic for some protocols (like PPTP, IPSEC and SIP).
sipXbridge needs static port NAT, or symmetric signalling in order to work
properly. This means when sipXbridge makes an media connection at port
30001,
I think we found out where is the problem. We disabled Symmetrical RTP
on voicetrading profile interface and now we have voice :)
How does Sipxecs work with symmetrical and not symmetrical RTP?
I suppose that this is related again with Nat Traversal thing.
I will be happy if someone explain to s
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 15:18 +, nathan.nieb...@sacatech.com wrote:
> Hey Tony, I'm curious when Internet calling should/should not be
> enabled Can you shed some light on this?
It should be enabled only if you are using an external (non-sipXecs) SBC
(like an Ingate) for NAT traversal and I
@list.sipfoundry.org
Sent: Wed Jan 06 10:18:55 2010
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No audio problem in both sides doing outgoingcalls
using voicetrading.com as ITSP
Hey Tony, I'm curious when Internet calling should/should not be enabled
Can you shed some light on this?
Thanks
-Original Message-
Hey Tony, I'm curious when Internet calling should/should not be enabled
Can you shed some light on this?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Tony Graziano
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:08:04
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No audio problem in both sides doing outgoing
calls usi
