boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Picher
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 27, 2010 8:54 PM
> *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
>
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Offical recommendation - 64 bit?
>
>
>
> Dittos to what Tony said... backup 4.2
alf Of Michael Picher
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 8:54 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Offical recommendation - 64 bit?
Dittos to what Tony said... backup 4.2.1 32 bit, restore to 4.2.1 64 bit
you need to backup/restore with the same version.
.
>
>
>
> *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Matthew Kitchin
> (public/usenet)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 27, 2010 3:25 PM
> *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Offical
y.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Offical recommendation - 64 bit?
With the memory requirements on a moderately busy system, I can't even consider
using 32 bit in my installations.
On 10/27/2010 2:48 PM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
Back in the day - the word on the street was to use the 32 bit
With the memory requirements on a moderately busy system, I can't even
consider using 32 bit in my installations.
On 10/27/2010 2:48 PM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
Back in the day -- the word on the street was to use the 32 bit
version of sipXecs (this was on the website somewhere). So when I
One of the reasons is that the freeswitch team only tests its stuff on
centos64. While I test opensolaris64 as well quite heavily I can't say if there
is anybody doing as excessive load tests as we do on the 64bit versions.
Am 27.10.2010 um 21:48 schrieb Nathaniel Watkins:
> Back in the day – t
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Nathaniel Watkins
wrote:
> Back in the day – the word on the street was to use the 32 bit version of
> sipXecs (this was on the website somewhere). So when I upgraded from 3.10
> to 4.0 I reluctantly followed that recommendation.
>
> It seems like now 64 bit is th
you can backup the 32 bit and restore to 64 bit now in 4.2.1, that's not
really an issue at the moment.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Nathaniel Watkins <
nwatk...@garrettcounty.org> wrote:
> Back in the day – the word on the street was to use the 32 bit version of
> sipXecs (this was on the w
Back in the day - the word on the street was to use the 32 bit version of
sipXecs (this was on the website somewhere). So when I upgraded from 3.10 to
4.0 I reluctantly followed that recommendation.
It seems like now 64 bit is the recommendation - am I safe to Assume that when
4.4 makes an appe
