Yes, PoE would be sweet.
From: Jim Canfield [mailto:jcanfi...@emstar.com]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 11:31 PM
To: Picher, Michael
Cc: Keith Gearty; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Patton M-ATA-1/E Micro Analogue Telephone
Adapter; 1 x FXS RJ11;
On Fri, Oct
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Picher, Michael
wrote:
> Seems good. Typical Patton. Size was nice and small!
>
>
Agreed. Kinda fun when it "tells" you it's IP too. I'm trying to convince
Patton to make a POE version...imagine the possibilities.
___
Seems good. Typical Patton. Size was nice and small!
-Original Message-
From: Keith Gearty [mailto:ke...@glensound.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:51 AM
To: Picher, Michael
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Patton M-ATA-1/E Micro Analogue Telephone
Picher, Michael wrote:
>We've tried them with a Mitel 3300 pbx but not with sipXecs... They are
>simple to setup.
>
What was your opinion of their quality, etc?
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoun
users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Patton M-ATA-1/E Micro Analogue Telephone
Adapter; 1 x FXS RJ11;
Keith Gearty wrote:
>Has anybody tried the Patton M-ATA-1/E with SipXecs? (It's basically a
>miniture 1 x FXS gateway). We're looking at using it together with our
>
Keith Gearty wrote:
>Has anybody tried the Patton M-ATA-1/E with SipXecs? (It's basically a
>miniture 1 x FXS gateway). We're looking at using it together with our
>analog DECT phones as an inexpensive replacement for the Snom m3, which
>was universally disliked.
>
>Does anyone know how well
Has anybody tried the Patton M-ATA-1/E with SipXecs? (It's basically a
miniture 1 x FXS gateway). We're looking at using it together with our
analog DECT phones as an inexpensive replacement for the Snom m3, which
was universally disliked.
Does anyone know how well its consultative call trans
