Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Expansion Module

It's automatic. As you add lines and speed dials to the phone they will "spill over" to the expansion console. No extra configuration is required. Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT Dept. (979) 361-4676 On 1/5/2010 12:14 PM, Austin Curry wrote: Is there anything spe

[sipx-users] Polycom Expansion Module

Is there anything special needed in SipX to add lines to the expansion module or does the phone add the lines to the BEM once the 6 lines on the phone are assigned? Austin Curry ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive:

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 09:15 -0400, Matt Keys wrote: > Fixed! You must enter the full username for the extension on the speed > dial list. An alias will not show status. In a PBS system with no changes in progress, aliases should work as well as the base username. But BLF indication for usernames

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

Ahhh... sorry I didn't catch that. On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 20:48 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > It says it is fixed in Rev-15779, when that is posted you should try then. > I'm sure it won't be too long before that is posted. > > >>> Matt Keys 06/16/09 8:40 PM >>> > Heads up, > > http://track.sip

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

It says it is fixed in Rev-15779, when that is posted you should try then. I'm sure it won't be too long before that is posted. >>> Matt Keys 06/16/09 8:40 PM >>> Heads up, http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-5920 says it's fixed in 4.0.1. I'm running: 4.0.1-015719 2009-06-03T17:16:58 ecs

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

Heads up, http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-5920 says it's fixed in 4.0.1. I'm running: 4.0.1-015719 2009-06-03T17:16:58 ecs-centos5.x64 On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 10:09 -0400, Damian Krzeminski wrote: > Matt Keys wrote: > > > > Fixed! You must enter the full username for the extension on the

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

Matt Keys wrote: > > Fixed! You must enter the full username for the extension on the speed > dial list. An alias will not show status. > > Starting with 4.0.1 (15779 - not released yet) sipXconfig will automatically replace the alias with username so users won't have to worry about it. See: X

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

: Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501) I don't think so, none of the other models have those red lights. How do I check that sipXecs is sending the indication that the users are available/unavailable? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Dale Worley [mailto:dwor...@norte

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

Keys Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501) On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 15:48 -0400, Matt Keys wrote: > We only have SoundPoint IP 301, 330, and 501 models. Only one (the > receptionist) has the expansion module with BLF lights. The speed dial > function works but the small

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 15:55 -0400, Matt Keys wrote: > That worked however the status indication lights do not change if the > user is on the phone or not. Subscribe to presence is enabled on all > entries. Are you able to successfully monitor the same phones using the BLF lights of a phone that do

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501) On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 09:04 -0400, Matt Keys wrote: > On the receptionist extension/phone I have presence enabled and BLF > pointing to the primary registration server. All users I want to show > up on the expansion module

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 09:04 -0400, Matt Keys wrote: > On the receptionist extension/phone I have presence enabled and BLF > pointing to the primary registration server. All users I want to show > up on the expansion module are also pointing to the primary > registration for BLF. What else is requir

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

rs@list.sipfoundry.org; Matt Keys Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501) Did you press "save and reboot the phone"? -Original Message- From: "Matt Keys" To: Sent: 6/8/2009 9:04:39 AM Subject: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501) On the

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

Send Profiles / Reboot? Yes. -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 9:07 AM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org; Matt Keys Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501) Did you press "save and reboot the

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

Did you press "save and reboot the phone"? -Original Message- From: "Matt Keys" To: Sent: 6/8/2009 9:04:39 AM Subject: [sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501) On the receptionist extension/phone I have presence enabled and BLF pointing to the primary regi

[sipx-users] Polycom expansion module (501)

On the receptionist extension/phone I have presence enabled and BLF pointing to the primary registration server. All users I want to show up on the expansion module are also pointing to the primary registration for BLF. What else is required for the expansion module to be populated? Thanks, Ma