Re: [sipx-users] Recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Application and BootROM versions for sipXecs 4.2.0

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > 3.2.2 has the SLA bug > 3.2.3 has the latency bug > 3.1.3RevC has an issue with EHS adapters for wireless headsets where if a > monitored extension is ringing then it signals the headset to ring as well. > 3.1.3RevC is stable but is missing my

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Application and BootROM versions for sipXecs 4.2.0

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > 3.2.2 has the SLA bug > 3.2.3 has the latency bug > 3.1.3RevC has an issue with EHS adapters for wireless headsets where if a > monitored extension is ringing then it signals the headset to ring as well. > 3.1.3RevC is stable but is missing my

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Application and BootROM versions for sipXecs 4.2.0

3.2.2 has the SLA bug 3.2.3 has the latency bug 3.1.3RevC has an issue with EHS adapters for wireless headsets where if a monitored extension is ringing then it signals the headset to ring as well. 3.1.3RevC is stable but is missing my favorite feature: ANI lookup (AKA reverse caller ID). I h

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Application and BootROM versions for sipXecs 4.2.0

On 7/15/2010 8:21 PM, Josh Patten wrote: Use the latest BootROM Use 3.2.2 if you don't need SLA Use 3.1.3RevC if you need SLA Isn't that backwards? I thought 3.2.2 was the latest that let SLA work but also introduced the bug with phones over circuits with latency. Maybe I'm mixing up my terms

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Application and BootROM versions for sipXecs 4.2.0

On 7/15/2010 8:40 PM, Tim Byng wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Josh Patten > wrote: Use the latest BootROM Use 3.2.2 if you don't need SLA Use 3.1.3RevC if you need SLA Thanks for the response Josh. I don't need SLA. I just found the follo

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Application and BootROM versions for sipXecs 4.2.0

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > Use the latest BootROM > > Use 3.2.2 if you don't need SLA > > Use 3.1.3RevC if you need SLA > Thanks for the response Josh. I don't need SLA. I just found the following from Tony: "Don't uise above 3.1.3RevC on a remote deployment!", so I'm

Re: [sipx-users] Recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Application and BootROM versions for sipXecs 4.2.0

Use the latest BootROM Use 3.2.2 if you don't need SLA Use 3.1.3RevC if you need SLA On 07/15/2010 08:20 PM, Tim Byng wrote: I've been reading through the documentation and threads trying to find the recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Applicaton and BootROM version. I know that there's a bug

[sipx-users] Recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Application and BootROM versions for sipXecs 4.2.0

I've been reading through the documentation and threads trying to find the recommended Polycom SoundPoint SIP Applicaton and BootROM version. I know that there's a bug with the 3.2.3 SIP Application, so I'll stay away from that. However, I've seen some recommendations to use 3.2.2 and some to use 3