ilto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Scott Lawrence
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 6:26 AM
To: Keith Gearty
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org; ingo...@netvision.an
Subject: [sipx-users] Redundancy and load-sharing in sipXecs
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:05 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
&
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 15:38 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> Of course the other way of looking at it is that SipXecs should be
> operational without the Primary server, but not configurable. In
> other words, maybe you should concentrate on making features like
> voicemail, ACD queues, autoattendants
> > That one has some very interesting implications... now that we've got
> > the configuration data centralized into sipXconfig properly (a major
> > element of 4.0), it's not as hard as it used to be.
>
> If you want to make sipXconfig HA, you need to use an HA database for
> storing the config d
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:07 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> That one has some very interesting implications... now that we've got
> the configuration data centralized into sipXconfig properly (a major
> element of 4.0), it's not as hard as it used to be.
If you want to make sipXconfig HA, you need
Of course the other way of looking at it is that SipXecs should be
operational without the Primary server, but not configurable. In other
words, maybe you should concentrate on making features like voicemail,
ACD queues, autoattendants, etc work on the secondary server alone, and
always keep t
Scott Lawrence wrote:
>> Scott Lawrence wrote:
>
>>> I'm interested in opinions on which services that are not currently
>>> redundant that users thing should be. If you could pick just one
>>> service for us to add HA to, what would it be?
>
> On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 14:41 +0100, Keith Gearty wr
Its tricky for sure. SipXconfig on the secondary server could become
active after a timeout of no contact with the primary server. You then
use an rsync based process when they find each other again.
Keith.
Scott Lawrence wrote:
Scott Lawrence wrote:
I'm interested in opinions
> Scott Lawrence wrote:
> > I'm interested in opinions on which services that are not currently
> > redundant that users thing should be. If you could pick just one
> > service for us to add HA to, what would it be?
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 14:41 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> SipXconfig. The abi
Scott Lawrence wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:05 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
Basically from what I can gather, the intended purpose of HA systems
is load balancing, not true redundancy. It would be nice if it were
designed with both purposes in mind, but it doesn't seem to be.
I wou
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 10:05 +0100, Keith Gearty wrote:
> Basically from what I can gather, the intended purpose of HA systems
> is load balancing, not true redundancy. It would be nice if it were
> designed with both purposes in mind, but it doesn't seem to be.
I wouldn't say that... our strateg
10 matches
Mail list logo
