Re: [sipx-users] Redundant registration for a limited period

2009-08-29 Thread Picher, Michael
PM To: ingo...@netvision.an Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Redundant registration for a limited period On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 14:05 -0400, ingo...@netvision.an wrote: > Each server is the DNS & DHCP server for its LAN. > > > Are you supplying multipl

Re: [sipx-users] Redundant registration for a limited period

2009-08-28 Thread Dale Worley
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 14:05 -0400, ingo...@netvision.an wrote: > Each server is the DNS & DHCP server for its LAN. > > > Are you supplying multiple DNS servers to the phones through DHCP? If the phone can't get to a DNS server, it cannot register (or make calls). You have to ensure that the phon

Re: [sipx-users] Redundant registration for a limited period

2009-08-28 Thread ingomar
Each server is the DNS & DHCP server for its LAN. > Are you supplying multiple DNS servers to the phones through DHCP? > > Mike ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsub

Re: [sipx-users] Redundant registration for a limited period

2009-08-28 Thread Picher, Michael
@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: [sipx-users] Redundant registration for a limited period I tested redundant registration with physically separate servers in HA system with DNS SRV load balancing. Only a router allows communication between the LAN segments. The phones are connected on the Primary LAN segment. First I

[sipx-users] Redundant registration for a limited period

2009-08-28 Thread ingomar
I tested redundant registration with physically separate servers in HA system with DNS SRV load balancing. Only a router allows communication between the LAN segments. The phones are connected on the Primary LAN segment. First I make sure all phones are registered, then I unplug the Primary server