On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Niek Vlessert niekvless...@gmail.com wrote:
SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch
1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too
new?
No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in
We did try it, by removing the SipXecs Freeswitch RPM and installing 'official'
Freeswitch 1.2.1 RPM's. Very basic testing showed no issues.
Thanks for the info.
Regards
Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:09 heeft Douglas Hubler het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Niek Vlessert
Excuse me, what we did was this, even easier:
- Add Official Freeswitch repo
- yum update
- This removes the freeswitch rpm package provided with sipxecs (not the
freeswitch sipxecs package if you know what I mean)
- Done :)
Op 14 sep. 2012, om 12:40 heeft Niek Vlessert het volgende geschreven:
Not exactly a regression test. Might want to do with abundance of caution
Sent from my twiddling thumbs.
Douglas Hubler dhub...@ezuce.com wrote:
This made my day,
A.) FS 1.2.1 works
B.) FS from their repo just works
Thanks Niek. I guess the answer is that is unofficially works, and
use this
