em?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
>Sent: donderdag 10 januari 2013 14:06
>To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
>Subject: Re: [sipx-users
...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
Sent: donderdag 10 januari 2013 15:30
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Strange behavior in dial plan regarding permissions
Since the Asterisk box is setup as a user also "I think" it creates
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
> Sent: donderdag 10 januari 2013 14:06
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Strange behavior in dial plan regardin
oblem?
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
Sent: donderdag 10 januari 2013 14:06
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Strange behavior in dial plan rega
I think this would behave differently using asterisk as a gateway.
Have you considered this?
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/ACD+solution+based+on+Askozia
Since it passes through a SBC it should not be required to make the
dialplan adjustments you are using.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:
Hi all,
We stumbled some time ago on a strange behavior in the dial plan regarding the
dial permissions.
The situation is as follows:
We have a few dial plan rules e.g.
- Mobile phones (required is the mobile call permission)
- Local numbers (required is the local call permis
