Maybe Jean @ VOP could shed some light on what's going on...
Mike
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Elwin Formsma wrote:
> Hi Joegen,
>
> This was actually a VOP sending the subscribe. I solved it by using the
> rls.
> Still the question remains though, why does the subscribe get forwarded?
> Doe
Hi Joegen,
This was actually a VOP sending the subscribe. I solved it by using the rls.
Still the question remains though, why does the subscribe get forwarded?
Doesn't make sense to me.
Regards,
Elwin
Op 18 apr. 2012, om 08:36 heeft Joegen Baclor het volgende geschreven:
> Do you provision
Do you provision your Polycom manually?
On 04/17/2012 05:54 PM, Elwin Formsma wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a problem where the presence of a user is not visible, because the
> subscribe to this user gets forwarded according to his forwarding rules in
> SipXecs.
> Situation:
> 482 subscribes to 28
Hello,
We have a problem where the presence of a user is not visible, because the
subscribe to this user gets forwarded according to his forwarding rules in
SipXecs.
Situation:
482 subscribes to 283
sipxecs sends subscribe to 006@gateway
presence fails.
Is this a known problem? You can find
